Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

I know we have a Anabolic Diet thread on the S&N forum.

Unfortunately that forum has turned into fat-loss cult.

The AD thread is glutted with people who follow the diet for two weeks then jump into thread posting about how awesome it is to eat bacon all day....then they vanish.

I wanna know if any of you bodybuilding types have used the diet long-term to gain mass.( Or if you've tried it and think it sucks!)

I am interested in reading about how you manage your carb levels.

I've read the book and I've browsed the AD thread, it seems like most people (in that thread) are staying under 30 grams of carbs well past the induction phase.

It seems like they are more intrested in dropping or maintaining weight as opposed to mass building.


Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

Curious.

It seems like the S&N posters don't follow the bodybuilding forum and the bodybuilders in this forum don't follow the AD.

I think I have my answer.

Report Post
 

Tiribulus
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 8880

I'm at 20 months solid and will never go back. Here's a tip. If you're thinking about starting the AD because of what you can eat don't waste your time. That's what a lot of guys do. The reason for eating like I do is because of the results it brings not because you think it requires less discipline. I'm talking generally, not to YOU.

Report Post
 

derek
Level 4

Join date: Nov 2002
Location:
Posts: 3637

I'm all for better ways of doing things. I'm also for bucking the tried-and-true methods just because.

That being said, it's my humble opinion that trying to bodybuild with almost zero carbs (save for the weekend) is so tough a walk, that you'd have a difficult time convincing me it's a better way.

According to Tribulus, it IS possible to bodybuild on the AD and I really like his attitude toward the diet and the reasons to NOT start it. Hopefully he can provide more insight for you.

Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

Tiribulus wrote:
I'm at 20 months solid and will never go back. Here's a tip. If you're thinking about starting the AD because of what you can eat don't waste your time. That's what a lot of guys do. The reason for eating like I do is because of the results it brings not because you think it requires less discipline. I'm talking generally, not to YOU.


Tiribulus, Thanks for the reply.
Do you keep the weekday carbs at 30 grams?

If not how high do you go?

I tried the AD for a several months last spring.

The body-comp changes were encouraging... then I would start feeling lethargic in the afternoon. My workouts suffered.

I tinkered with my carb levels and ended up drifting into a Paleo type diet. Now I don't count carbs but I limit my carb sources to fruits & veggies.

I'm thinking about doing the AD again with a more mass oriented approach.

Have you gained weight/mass on this diet?

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

Yes, I had an extensive (2 year) mass gaining cycle with the Anabolic Diet. It was 1995-1997, when the book had first came out. I was a big follower of the "Serious Growth" folks back then....Leo Costa, Tom Platz, etc. and they were the first to market DiPasquale's Anabolic DIet. I dieted down with the diet over the summer of 95 to 178 lbs @ 5'10. I was 19 years old then. In September, I began a 3800-4000 calorie Anabolic Diet plan with liberal carb up weekends.

My training was with the "Big Beyond Belief" program that Platz and Costa wrote about in their book. I didn't take extensive notes on a training day by training day basis, but I did measure bodyfat, bodyweight, and arm measurements on a monthly basis. I'd have to go back and pull it out of my records, but it went something like this: Beginning- arms 16.5" Waist 32 inches, chest, 40 inches Bench press 295 x 1 Squat- 365 x 1.

Well, 18 months later after following this training program and the AD the numbers were- Bodyweight- 245 lbs, arms 19.75", waist 34 inches, chest 48.5 inches, Bench 445 x 1 Squat 405 x 13 reps ( 3 sets ). I know everyone is rolling their eyes right now saying this is total bull, but I stake my reputation as a charter member of T-Nation this is true.

Now granted all I did was go to school, deliver pizza two nights a week, eat, and train heavy. It was unbelievable strength and size gains, which really took me by surprise considering I had been serious about training all through my high school career. It must have been the right combination of food, training, and me maturing. One side effect that I really hated, and that is still with me is that I had MASSIVE MASSIVE stretch marks over my entire body. The were bright red and covered my arms all the way down to mid forearm, my chest, back, legs, ass, heck just about everywhere but my face! I have long suspected that perhaps I was deficient in PUFA in my diet from the AD which contributed to my skin not being as elastic as it needed to be.

After the AD bulking cycle, I dieted down to enter that silly EAS Lamborghini contest. I got back down to 195 ( very lean) and actually placed in the top ten in my age group in that contest and received a year's supply of three supplements.

To sum it up, 98% of all the muscle I have ever gained has been on the AD. I know I am do not have typical results, but it was very good to me. I would definitely recommend it( with a few mods) to anyone looking to gain solid bodyweight with minimal fat gain. It was extremely easy after about 3 weeks. THats all I can think of at the moment. Ask away if you have any Q's!

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

It IS possible to gain muscle and strength on a low-carbs diet.

My friend Hugo Girard, who used to be top 3 in the world in WSM (World Strongest Man) is training to make a comeback (after tearing his Achilles tendon) and he is eating a low-carbs diet. It is even stricter than the AD since he only has one carb-up day a week and he doesn't consume as much saturated fat as those using the typical AD.

While he is not a bodybuilder, the fact that as of last Friday he is 332lbs at 10.5% bodyfat (trust me, he IS that lean!) on 6'2'' kinda makes me believe that his results are applicable for bodybuilding purposes!

So yes, it is possible to gain on such a diet. But caloric intake must be high enough to fuel muscle growth. A lot of peoples consume too little calories when trying to gain on a low-carbs diet. In fact, it is one of the fat-loss benefits of such a diet: you are not that hungry and it's harder to get a high amount of calories in.

To build muscle you need:

- A sufficient amount of protein. Proteins are the building blocks of muscle; the raw material used to build a house. Without sufficient raw material you cannot build the house.

- A sufficient energy intake. Building muscle is an energy-dependent process. Yes you need protein to build muscle, but the process of using those protein to fabricate new muscle tissue require energy, and lots of it. See energy as the salary you pay the workers who are building your house: if you don't pay them enough they will not work as well and as fast. Furthermore, building muscle is just about the last priority of your body, behind all the other stuff necessary for survival. So only the energy left over from fueling your daily activities and bodily processes can be used to build muscle. Energy is essentially either carbs or fat. Protein can also be used for energy, but we don't want that! So if you cut your carbs, you NEED to have a high fat intake to have enough energy to fuel your daily needs THEN build muscle.

- An adequate amount of the essential nutrients. There are no ''essential carbohydrates''. However there are essential amino acids and essential fatty acids. Amino acid needs will be covered if protein intake is high. Essential fatty acids, especially the DHA/EPA ones are often underestimated yet they are essential for optimal muscle building, especially on a low-carbs diet.

- An insulin spike at the right time. To maximise post-workout recovery and anabolism we need an insulin spike post-workout. Normally we use carbs post-workout to spike insulin, but on a low-carbs diet we can't. However several amino acids do have pro-insulin properties. The BCAAs and especially leucine, glutamine, glycine can all spike insuline. Whey isolate also has a pro-insulin property. So it is very important to consume a large amount of protein, BCAAs (15-30g), glutamine (10-20g and more if your stomach can handle it) and ideally glycine (5-10g or more if your stomach can handle it).

- Glutamine, even though it is a somewhat overrated supplement, especially if you are eating carbs, can be very useful on a low-carbs diet because it can be turned into glucose than stored as glycogen in the muscle. So even though you are not consuming carbs, if your daily glutamine intake is high, your glycogen stores will never be depleted.

- Glutamine can also increase blood pH; in other words it makes the body/blood less acid. A high protein intake has the opposite effect (it makes it more acid). When blood pH is low (more acid) muscle building and fat loss are decreased. So ingesting 5g of glutamine with every protein meal is a very effective way of improving the efficacy of this diet. Note that green veggies have the same acid-lowering property as glutamine.

Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

Thank you all for the replies.

Now that I look back it's possible I was under eating while on my AD experiment.

Report Post
 

dylan10507
Level 2

Join date: Feb 2007
Location:
Posts: 355

Thanks for posting CT that it is very interesting and helpful. But I do not understand why you would go on a low carb diet to replenish glycogen and have an insulin spike in other ways I thought the purpose of a low carb diet was to lower insulin It this just because some people feel like crap after eating carbs(I am one of them) and these things do not have that effect or is there another reason? And does the glutamine with protein containing meals go against the no carbs + fat rule I thought the point of that rule was to avoid an insulin spike when eating fat. I don't doubt tha these recomendations work I just don't understand why

Report Post
 

ronaldo7
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1329

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
It IS possible to gain muscle and strength on a low-carbs diet.

My friend Hugo Girard, who used to be top 3 in the world in WSM (World Strongest Man) is training to make a comeback (after tearing his Achilles tendon) and he is eating a low-carbs diet. It is even stricter than the AD since he only has one carb-up day a week and he doesn't consume as much saturated fat as those using the typical AD.

While he is not a bodybuilder, the fact that as of last Friday he is 332lbs at 10.5% bodyfat (trust me, he IS that lean!) on 6'2'' kinda makes me believe that his results are applicable for bodybuilding purposes!

So yes, it is possible to gain on such a diet. But caloric intake must be high enough to fuel muscle growth. A lot of peoples consume too little calories when trying to gain on a low-carbs diet. In fact, it is one of the fat-loss benefits of such a diet: you are not that hungry and it's harder to get a high amount of calories in.

To build muscle you need:

- A sufficient amount of protein. Proteins are the building blocks of muscle; the raw material used to build a house. Without sufficient raw material you cannot build the house.

- A sufficient energy intake. Building muscle is an energy-dependent process. Yes you need protein to build muscle, but the process of using those protein to fabricate new muscle tissue require energy, and lots of it. See energy as the salary you pay the workers who are building your house: if you don't pay them enough they will not work as well and as fast. Furthermore, building muscle is just about the last priority of your body, behind all the other stuff necessary for survival. So only the energy left over from fueling your daily activities and bodily processes can be used to build muscle. Energy is essentially either carbs or fat. Protein can also be used for energy, but we don't want that! So if you cut your carbs, you NEED to have a high fat intake to have enough energy to fuel your daily needs THEN build muscle.

- An adequate amount of the essential nutrients. There are no ''essential carbohydrates''. However there are essential amino acids and essential fatty acids. Amino acid needs will be covered if protein intake is high. Essential fatty acids, especially the DHA/EPA ones are often underestimated yet they are essential for optimal muscle building, especially on a low-carbs diet.

- An insulin spike at the right time. To maximise post-workout recovery and anabolism we need an insulin spike post-workout. Normally we use carbs post-workout to spike insulin, but on a low-carbs diet we can't. However several amino acids do have pro-insulin properties. The BCAAs and especially leucine, glutamine, glycine can all spike insuline. Whey isolate also has a pro-insulin property. So it is very important to consume a large amount of protein, BCAAs (15-30g), glutamine (10-20g and more if your stomach can handle it) and ideally glycine (5-10g or more if your stomach can handle it).

- Glutamine, even though it is a somewhat overrated supplement, especially if you are eating carbs, can be very useful on a low-carbs diet because it can be turned into glucose than stored as glycogen in the muscle. So even though you are not consuming carbs, if your daily glutamine intake is high, your glycogen stores will never be depleted.

- Glutamine can also increase blood pH; in other words it makes the body/blood less acid. A high protein intake has the opposite effect (it makes it more acid). When blood pH is low (more acid) muscle building and fat loss are decreased. So ingesting 5g of glutamine with every protein meal is a very effective way of improving the efficacy of this diet. Note that green veggies have the same acid-lowering property as glutamine.


Would one have to eat more calories during a mass phase while on a diet such as the AD or would it be a good idea to eat the same amount as when one is on a high carb diet??

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

dylan10507 wrote:
Thanks for posting CT that it is very interesting and helpful. But I do not understand why you would go on a low carb diet to replenish glycogen and have an insulin spike in other ways I thought the purpose of a low carb diet was to lower insulin


Actually the REAL reason why low-carb diets work is not so much because of the low insulin levels (which does play a role mind you) but rather because your body is forced to turned to other fuel sources for fuel.

YES replenishing SOME glycogen via the use of other products still allow you to maintain a decent intra-muscular glycogen level. But this doesn't prevent adaptation to using fat for fuel as long as you are no consuming carbs. It simply means that you will have a bit more ''gas'' for your high-intensity workouts.

You can replenish some glycogen with glutamine, BCAAs and glycine, but not enough to prevent a metabolic shift to using fat for fuel.

Furthermore you WANT an insulin spike post-workout. While insulin can lead to fat storage, when properly timed it is a highly anabolic hormone that is almost mandatory for growth.

BUT the insulin spike from the consumption of glucogenic amino acids will be short lived, after 90 minutes or so insulin levels will be back to baseline. So it doesn't interfere with fat burning.

dylan10507 wrote:
It this just because some people feel like crap after eating carbs(I am one of them) and these things do not have that effect or is there another reason?


That might be an effect; a lot of peoples do much better on a low-carbs/moderate fat diet. But it is really a side benefit. The real reason is that to switch to a ketogenic state, in which fat/ketones become your primary fuel source, you need to drop your carbs below 50g a day.

dylan10507 wrote:
And does the glutamine with protein containing meals go against the no carbs + fat rule I thought the point of that rule was to avoid an insulin spike when eating fat. I don't doubt tha these recomendations work I just don't understand why


1. The no carbs + fat rule is overrated IMHO, even JB is gradually moving away from this one. If someone is consuming low-glycemic carbs along with some fat, there is no problem... that is if you are following a balanced diet.

2. 5g of glutamine will not cause an insulin spike. Ingesting 5g of glutamine is like ingesting 2g of sugar... which is nothing. In other words 5g of glutamine will have the same impact on insulin as chewing 1 piece of sugar-free gum!!!

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

ronaldo7 wrote:
Would one have to eat more calories during a mass phase while on a diet such as the AD or would it be a good idea to eat the same amount as when one is on a high carb diet??


Seriously all you guys should stop thinking in terms of calories and start thinking in terms of nutrients. Your body doesn't recognize ''calories'' ... it's just a measuring unit. It only recognizes the amount of type of nutrients ingested.

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
dylan10507 wrote:
Thanks for posting CT that it is very interesting and helpful. But I do not understand why you would go on a low carb diet to replenish glycogen and have an insulin spike in other ways I thought the purpose of a low carb diet was to lower insulin

Actually the REAL reason why low-carbs diet work is not so much because of the low insulin levels (which does play a role mind you) but rather because your body is forced to turned to other fuel sources for fuel. YES replenishing SOME glycogen via the use of other products still allow you to maintain a decent intra-muscular glycogen level. But this doesn't prevent adaptation to using fat for fuel as long as you are no consuming carbs. It simply means that you will have a bit more ''gas'' for your high-intensity workouts.

You can replenish some glycogen with glutamine, BCAAs and glycine, but not enough to prevent a metabolic shift to using fat for fuel.

Furthermore you WANT an insulin spike post-workout. While insulin can lead to fat storage, when properly timed it is a highly anabolic hormone that is almost mandatory for growth.


Of course, hormonal manipulation is the entire goal of cyclic ketogenic diets. The one glaring drawback to the AD and one that Duchaine and Michael Z. attempted to address was incorporating training to take FULL advantage of the wild hormonal fluctuations present at various points during the week on these CKDs. The Ultimate Diet probably came the closest to this coordination.

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

ronaldo7 wrote:
Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

Would one have to eat more calories during a mass phase while on a diet such as the AD or would it be a good idea to eat the same amount as when one is on a high carb diet??


The answer is yes you will have to eat slightly more calories to have the same energy output, calorie for calorie, when comparing high-fat low carb diets with their higher carb counterparts regardless of if you are using it for mass gain or fat loss.

The reason is that beta-oxidation (the pathway fats are broken down for energy) is less efficient than the same amount of carbohydrate would be. In essence, some of the potential energy is used up actually processing the molecule. This inefficiency requires more fat (calories) to be shoved through Kreb's to get the energy required. Its a very neat advantage for people who like to eat more food.

Report Post
 

alaw4516
Level 2

Join date: Dec 2007
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 152

How long do you have to be below 50g of carbs a day before your body starts using fats/ketones as a primary source of energy/ when can you have a carb up day? After that how long til the next carb up day, for muscle gain.

Also do you need to have large carb up days or can I just have oatmeal in the am, Surge PWO and maybe a nice juicy hamburger and some fries for dinner :)?

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

alaw4516 wrote:
How long do you have to be below 50g of carbs a day before your body starts using fats/ketones as a primary source of energy/


7 to 21 days depending on your hormonal balance, training volume and previous dietary practices.

alaw4516 wrote:
when can you have a carb up day?


Never... I do not recommend a full carb-up day unless you are under 10% body fat. When you have a full day of carbing-up (especially if it is excessive) it will take you 2-3 days to get back into ketosis (using primary fat/ketones for fuel)... so that leave you around 3 days for real fat loss. Now, if your main goal is to gain mass this aspect isn't as problematic, but you will have a hard time staying in fat burning mode and that means that you will feel lethargic and lack energy because fat will never stay your primary fuel source.

I recommand anywhere from 1 carb-up meal per week up to half a day (3 meals) depending on the degree of leanness.

BUT when you start this diet you CANNOT have a carb-up until you are clearly fat adapted. That's why my clients cannot have carbs until the end of the second week of dieting. Then they can normally have one carb-up meal every week.



alaw4516 wrote:
Also do you need to have large carb up days or can I just have oatmeal in the am, surge PWO and maybe a nice juicy hamburger and some fries for dinner :)?


I always recommend carbing-up with clean food. Normally I will allow SURGE post-workout and then a clean carb meal of around 150g of carbs at the last meal of the day. I used to recommend having it at breakfast but changed my mind because of:

- Charles Poliquin who showed me that during a low-carbs diet you are actually more insulin sensitive in the evening AND the carbs will help you sleep better.

- Dave Palumbo who does it for a more practical reason: if you have your carbs at your last meal, you will not be as tempted to eat them again during the day. If you have carbs early, you will often crave them for the rest of the day and end up doing an excessive carb-up.

Report Post
 

SSC
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4018

Okay, I'm reading about this Anabolic Diet and am actually fairly intrigued, because I'm still relatively high in BF, but after taking a year to get serious about losing weight I really don't want to sacrifice strength and size gains. That being said, with the anabolic diet requiring very few carbs, does this essentially mean no protein shakes? I assume if there's an abundance of red meat we could get our protein through that means, but I just want to make sure. Also, do things like Superfood or Surge play a large role into the Anabolic Diet?

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

SSC wrote:
Okay, I'm reading about this Anabolic Diet and am actually fairly intrigued, because I'm still relatively high in BF, but after taking a year to get serious about losing weight I really don't want to sacrifice strength and size gains. That being said, with the anabolic diet requiring very few carbs, does this essentially mean no protein shakes? I assume if there's an abundance of red meat we could get our protein through that means, but I just want to make sure. Also, do things like Superfood or Surge play a large role into the Anabolic Diet?


OK, first and foremost, I personally do not advocate the Anabolic Diet itself. It has some shortcomings:

- no distinction in the type of fat consumed
- two days of carbing up and no limits to the carb-up
- 60-70% of the calories from fat

I prefer a low-carbs (less than 50g/day like the AD) but with the following differences:

- focus on integrating more ''good fats'' (plenty of fish oil, coconut oil for cooking, olive oil, some nuts and seeds) and less ''bad fats'' (I like to rely mostly on wild red meat like buffalo, bison, venison, deer instead of beef. I also like to use a lot of ostrich, chicken, turkey and fish)

- Amount of carbing-up depending on your degree of leanness. I never recommend more than one day of carb-up, and this is for very lean individuals. Most should stay between 1 and 3 carb-up meals during a day for no more than 200-250g of carbs total

- During the low carbs day protein can be as high as 50-55% and fat around 40-45%. I actually don't count percentages, I go with an amount of nutrients relative to bodyweight.

As a baseline if you main goal is to lose fat:
- Protein: 1.5 to 1.75g per pound
- Fat: 0.5g to 0.75g per pound
- Carbs: less than 50g

So if you are 200lbs that would mean 300-350g of protein, 100-150g of fat, less than 50g of carbs per day.

* Adjust these amounts weekly depending on how your body is reacting.

If you are trying to add size you should start by adding around 10-15% in protein and fats and adjust from there.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

SSC wrote:
That being said, with the anabolic diet requiring very few carbs, does this essentially mean no protein shakes?


You can have regular shakes (e.g. low-carbs Metabolic Drive or Grow! whey) made with a protein powder with 3-4g or less of carbs per serving; but you mix it in water or crystal light.

You can have up to 50g of carbs, so if you get 10g from your shake you are fine. Most of the carbs should come from green veggies and nuts and seeds.

Be careful of hidden carbs. A lot of peoples actually drink juice, milk or soda when trying a low-carbs diet... the problem is that those are very high in carbs, so they are a big no-no. In fact, beside the shakes, the only things you should drink are: water, coffee (no sugar, splenda is ok), tea, crystal light, diet soda in moderation.

SSC wrote:
Also, do things like Superfood or Surge play a large role into the Anabolic Diet?


Superfood is a great addition because you can't eat fruits on this diet and no veggies besides green veggies. So Superfood will provide you with some micronutrients you might be lacking.

Surge should be used since one serving will put you above your daily carbs limit. You could have 1/2 a serving (25g of carbs) though but in that case you would have to really monitor your carbs intake closely to avoid going above 50g.

Report Post
 

SSC
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4018

Okay, thanks, this helps a lot. I still have a decent shelf of fat on me, but again, as a former-HUGE-boy, I want to continue to get stronger and bigger, while trying to get the rest of this fat off of my body. The type of plan you're suggesting sounds ideal, but another question stems from your suggestion.

You mentioned the general baseline for losing fat. If I stuck to this, and began losing fat, would I in turn lose strength or muscle size, or is going to help me maintain? I'm just curious, because when I went on my year-long diet stint I lost a significant amount of strength and some size, too.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

SSC wrote:
Okay, thanks, this helps a lot. I still have a decent shelf of fat on me, but again, as a former-HUGE-boy, I want to continue to get stronger and bigger, while trying to get the rest of this fat off of my body. The type of plan you're suggesting sounds ideal, but another question stems from your suggestion.

You mentioned the general baseline for losing fat. If I stuck to this, and began losing fat, would I in turn lose strength or muscle size, or is going to help me maintain? I'm just curious, because when I went on my year-long diet stint I lost a significant amount of strength and some size, too.


When dieting is done properly, you should never lose strength or muscle mass. YES you will ''feel'' smaller because your muscles will be depleted of glycogen and water, but if you do everything right you will not regress. Heck, I recently broken my record on the incline bench press (405lbs) while being on a fat loss diet.

In fact I always say that when dieting down you should ALWAYS strive to push your strength up. As long as your strength goes up or is at least maintained, you are not losing muscle mass.

Report Post
 

SSC
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4018

Okay, again, thanks for the info. When I was dieting was before I really starting eating up the information at T-Nation, and was only raking in somewhere between 1,500-1,800 calories a day while trying to gain muscle mass... how little I knew. On top of that, I also probably only brought in somewhere between 100-150 grams of protein, so I definitely had no idea of what I was doing. Thankfully, I found T-Nation before it was too late.

Report Post
 

alaw4516
Level 2

Join date: Dec 2007
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 152

So with my bodyweight being 165lbs, I should only consume 2680 calories to gain mass? My goal is to gain mass with little fat gain, it seems really hard when I only get 2680 calories a day. Do these numbers seem right

1.75xBW + 10%= 316g protein
.75xBW + 10%= 135g fat
50g carbs

Report Post
 

SSC
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4018

I do also apologize to the OP for the thread hijack.

Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

SSC wrote:
I do also apologize to the OP for the thread hijack.


No need to apologize dude. I'm glad this thread is getting some action.

Report Post
 

ronaldo7
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1329

CT from your personal experience and clients, what would you say is better to gain mass while not becoming a fat-ass??...would you go low carb?? or would you go high fat??.

I been on the AD for a while and trying to lose some fat at the moment but tend to go overboard on the carb-ups. This upcoming weekend I will try your method however if I make my last 3 meals mostly carbs then what would I do with the first 3 meals of the day??..Should I make them high in protein with some veggies??

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

ronaldo7 wrote:
CT from your personal experience and clients, what would you say is better to gain mass while not becoming a fat-ass??...would you go low carb?? or would you go high fat??.

I been on the AD for a while and trying to lose some fat at the moment but tend to go overboard on the carb-ups. This upcoming weekend I will try your method however if I make my last 3 meals mostly carbs then what would I do with the first 3 meals of the day??..Should I make them high in protein with some veggies??


If thats you in the picture to the left, you should not be too worried about losing bodyfat at the moment.

Report Post
 

medevac
Level 3

Join date: Mar 2006
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 375

I've been on the AD for about a month now, which isn't long-term by any stretch, but I'm getting familiar with it.

Let me state one thing outright, at 177 lbs I DO NOT need to cut any weight, and that was not my intention when starting it. I stay close to 10%-12% BF pretty much all the time and I am a chronic undereater, so I don't need to get cut or anything silly like that. That wasn't my intension.

My main goal was testing my carb tolerance. What actually caught my attention was my steady increase in caffeine throughout the day. I did get a work promotion but nothing too stress inducing, I'm currently not in classes, and my schedule hasn't changed...yet my reliance on the energy spike continued to grow over the past 6 months and it was affecting my sleeping habits (vicious circle).

So I started looking at my diet because my slumps were usually after eating. I was eating fairly clean but with high protein and carbs.

I started AD just to limit my carbs as an experiment and I kept a very close eye on the scale over the past 4-6 weeks. For the first week there was no change at all (thank god) and I even went up a pound. By the third week, I was noticing a drop to right around 170 to 171 lbs, and then a glycogen/water increase up to 177 or so right after the carb days.

But what I did like was that I gained some muscle and lost a small amount of fat (keep in mind I didn't really care to measure it, I'm going by the mirror so it may have been water as well). Mainly though I started feeling a bit better with lower carbs...this might be because I was increasing my protein or because I am not as tolerant of carbs as I thought I was.

The things I didn't like was feeling almost ill the second day after getting carbs (like I was getting a cold), and as CT stated the disregard of fat or carb types.

I am going out of town next week and when I get back I am probably going to modify it to be a bit more conscious of the fats. I also like CTs thoughts on three carb meals as opposed to a whole weekend, that may help with the "feeling like crap on tuesday".

Oh, and if I start to lose weight all bets are off, and I'm diving into a box of Little Debbies.

Report Post
 

ronaldo7
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1329

MODOK wrote:
ronaldo7 wrote:
CT from your personal experience and clients, what would you say is better to gain mass while not becoming a fat-ass??...would you go low carb?? or would you go high fat??.

I been on the AD for a while and trying to lose some fat at the moment but tend to go overboard on the carb-ups. This upcoming weekend I will try your method however if I make my last 3 meals mostly carbs then what would I do with the first 3 meals of the day??..Should I make them high in protein with some veggies??

If thats you in the picture to the left, you should not be too worried about losing bodyfat at the moment.


That is me indeed but from a few months ago. I had to stop training for sometime and gained a bunch of fat. I'm just trying to get the body fat down in the next 4-8 weeks to start a gaining phase at around 9-10% bf.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

alaw4516 wrote:
So with my bodyweight being 165lbs, I should only consume 2680 calories to gain mass? My goal is to gain mass with little fat gain, it seems really hard when I only get 2680 calories a day. Do these numbers seem right

1.75xBW + 10%= 316g protein
.75xBW + 10%= 135g fat
50g carbs


As I mentionned:

1. It's a STARTING POINT... adjust your food intake according to how your body is responding

2. Your body doesn't recognize calories, only nutrients

Report Post
 

Gymjunkie
Level 0

Join date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 770

Not that you guys wont listen, BUT LISTEN to everything CT has to say regarding low carb diets and everything to do with it, as he is thet truth. I used the AD for approx 7 months and gained ALOT of fat thanks to the 2 f%#ing carb up days and the recommendations I recieved from others on the AD, who may have responded well to them...I did not. It is a VERY individual thing(carbs ups) and amount of nutrients etc. I highly recommend a low carb approach to fat loss and muscle preservation.

I know you guys are thinking we have heard this, coming from coach CT, but just wanted to chime in, as I have recently made great changes in my physique from ALL his recommendations...

GJ

Report Post
 

tayjeremy
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 270

Gymjunkie, Ahmen.

I followed the whole carb-up thing. and i gained weight. Yey. But what? my Lifts were actually going down...?

Right now I've been on the low/no Carb diet, with the macro nutrient split for fat loss. and its Working. And I have been busting my Personal Records almost every 2-3 weeks.

Low Carb Diets work, well for me they do cause they help with insulin sensitivity. And what fats you use Really do Matter.(Being a former super fat boy at 5'5 @90kgs+ about 3 years ago). Read Coach CT's "Thin Gets Riped" fourm.

Report Post
 

SSC
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4018

I was thinking about this diet a little more last night before I went to sleep, and I thought of another question: How do people eat before a workout and immediately after? I'm generally eating some whole grains before a workout for some slow-burning energy, and I'll drink a G2 or something like that afterwards with my protein shake to get some fast-burning carbs in there. Without carbs or Surge though, what do people on the AD resort to?

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

SSC wrote:
I was thinking about this diet a little more last night before I went to sleep, and I thought of another question: How do people eat before a workout and immediately after? I'm generally eating some whole grains before a workout for some slow-burning energy, and I'll drink a G2 or something like that afterwards with my protein shake to get some fast-burning carbs in there. Without carbs or Surge though, what do people on the AD resort to?


You don't really need a special meal pre-workout once you are adapted to using fat/ketones for fuel since you will never run out of it, contrary to carbs which have to be ''loaded'' since you cannot store a lot of it.

I do, however recommend taking in 10g of BCAA and 10g of glutamine pre-workout (immediately before) and another 10-20g (at least) of BCAAs during the workout (for its anti-catabolic properties.

Post-workout I recommend 2 scoops of whey protein, another 10g of BCAAs and 10-20g of glutamine.

Report Post
 

SSC
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 4018

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
SSC wrote:
I was thinking about this diet a little more last night before I went to sleep, and I thought of another question: How do people eat before a workout and immediately after? I'm generally eating some whole grains before a workout for some slow-burning energy, and I'll drink a G2 or something like that afterwards with my protein shake to get some fast-burning carbs in there. Without carbs or Surge though, what do people on the AD resort to?

You don't really need a special meal pre-workout once you are adapted to using fat/ketones for fuel since you will never run out of it, contrary to carbs which have to be ''loaded'' since you cannot store a lot of it.

I do, however recommend taking in 10g of BCAA and 10g of glutamine pre-workout (immediately before) and another 10-20g (at least) of BCAAs during the workout (for its anti-catabolic properties.

Post-workout I recommend 2 scoops of whey protein, another 10g of BCAAs and 10-20g of glutamine.


Great, thanks for all of the help CT. I've been interested in getting BCAAs, glutamine (although I guess I'll have to get these from somewhere non-Biotest,) and Superfood. If I do decide to take on the Anabolic diet, you've given me a lot of guidelines and tips to help figure out what's good for me and my body, so hopefully I'll be able to obtain optimal results.

Report Post
 

alaw4516
Level 2

Join date: Dec 2007
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 152

If in order to get our bodies to use fat/ketones as primary fuel, we have to be in ketosis, but what if we are just using a low carb diet (<100g), is the primary fuel source carbs or is it mostly fat and some carbs. Basically what i'm trying to say is if you're not in ketosis, is there even a point to going low carb?

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

alaw4516 wrote:
If in order to get our bodies to use fat/ketones as primary fuel, we have to be in ketosis, but what if we are just using a low carb diet (<100g), is the primary fuel source carbs or is it mostly fat and some carbs. Basically what i'm trying to say is if you're not in ketosis, is there even a point to going low carb?


You do not have to be in ketosis to burn fat. Heck, you can lose fat by consuming a high carbs diet as long as your energy intake is lower than your expenditure.

At 75-100g of carbs you can burn a significant amount of fat without being in ketosis. However some peoples feel like shit on this type of dieting. For these peoples, using a low-carbs diet without being in ketosis leads to cravings and mood swings. Why? Because the brain can only use carbs and ketones for fuel (not fat directly). So at 100g of carbs per day you might not be giving enough for your brain to function optimally (especially if you perform a lot of strength work, which naturally relies on carbs/glycogen for fuel). Since you are not producing a lot of ketones (you are not in a ketogenic state) your brain might feel deprived, at which point you will have problems focusing, you will suffer mood swings, lack energy and drive and will have huge carb cravings.

Some people (myself for example) do not have that problem. Why? Because some individuals can actually consume more carbs (up to 100g) and still be in ketosis. This is mostly due to insulin sensitivity, metabolic rate and activity levels.

Those who can function well with 100g of carbs per day will have no problem losing fat provided that their energy intake is correct; but those who need to consume less carbs to stay in ketosis will feel like crap.

Report Post
 

alaw4516
Level 2

Join date: Dec 2007
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 152

Thanks coach, this clears a lot of things up. You must be a very sensitive guy, with all that Flameout and insulinomics ;). I just fish oil was cheaper. With the amount you need to really help insulin sensitivity, i would need about a bottle of Flameout a week! Too much $$ for me.

Report Post
 

Tiribulus
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 8880

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
<<< You don't really need a special meal pre-workout once you are adapted to using fat/ketones for fuel since you will never run out of it, contrary to carbs which have to be ''loaded'' since you cannot store a lot of it. >>>


Here's how it's gone for me and it is related to the above.

I started the AD in Aug. 06 and on the advice of Disc Hoss did it strictly by the book for the first three months. For the first 2 I had energy fluctuations and weird sleep issues all over the place.

Gradually I settled in with every early inconsistency going away. I have made the following adjustments which might not qualify my diet as even being the AD any more, but in my mind the money principle is a lipid adapted metabolism.

I actually eat more carbs than was called for in the original AD, but probably less than what's allowed in the Anabolic Solution, DiPasquale's updated version.

I drink a workout shake that has 50 or 60 grams of carbs. I get a gulp before training, sip on it while I'm training and finish it when I'm done. I train VERY hard 3 days a week.

I do eat lots of EFA's and am sane, but not alarmist with my animal fat intake.

My carb loads are almost immaculately clean and while they are at the moment 2 days I do not gorge on carbs and especially not in any one meal.

I do eat shit loads of all kinds of hot peppers, peppers, greens, squash, broccoli, celery etc. Carb loads are sweet potatoes, some potatoes, home cooked beans etc and different kinds of fruit about 98% The closest I come to junk is air popped popcorn with a combination of real butter, extra virgin coconut oil and EVOO/Lawry's seasoned salt.

The thing that stuck with me about the above was the idea of fats/ketones being used for anaerobic work or at least that's what it sounds like you're saying. Everything I've read and experienced indicates that glycogen is the only fuel usable for anaerobic work read weightlifting. Having an adequate supply available would then be essential to avoid the inefficient conversion of other sources into glycogen during training hence the need for maintaining glycogen stores without readapting to a glucose based metabolism.

I'm a bit taken aback by your seeming recommendation for 1 carb meal a week? I don't know how you would have sufficient glucose for training under that plan. A very high fat intake as well as adipose stores would take care of all other energy needs, but weight training requires glycogen. Also, without the corresponding high fat intake a low carb diet can result in aminos being converted for fuel which is the kiss of death if it goes on long enough.

I'm with ya on the not having to lose muscle while dieting, especially with a low carb/high fat approach, but low carb without the corresponding fully fat adapted metabolism leaves gluconeogenesis from aminos as the most readily available fuel source and hence skeletal muscle danging there as a tempting treat.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time and I do have a great deal of respect for your knowledge, not to mention I may have simply misunderstood, but these points will nag me if I don't mention them.

On another note, I really REALLY believe the vast majority of people just do not give a fat adapted lifestyle enough time to work it's magic and that's what it comes down to. A fat adapted lifestyle, whatever label or version it winds up being. Like I say What I do know probably isn't exactly the AD the AD anymore, but it is a fully fat adapted lifestyle.

Report Post
 

andersons
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1243

Tiribulus wrote:

<< My carb loads are almost immaculately clean and while they are at the moment 2 days I do not gorge on carbs and especially not in any one meal.


When are your carb loads in relation to your training?

The thing that stuck with me about the above was the idea of fats/ketones being used for anaerobic work or at least that's what it sounds like you're saying. Everything I've read and experienced indicates that glycogen is the only fuel usable for anaerobic work read weightlifting.


I have been wondering about this as well.

On another note, I really REALLY believe the vast majority of people just do not give a fat adapted lifestyle enough time to work it's magic and that's what it comes down to. A fat adapted lifestyle, whatever label or version it winds up being. Like I say What I do know probably isn't exactly the AD the AD anymore, but it is a fully fat adapted lifestyle.


What specifically are the benefits of the fat adapted lifestyle? Compared to, say, eating the same exact foods you eat now, but with a portion of your clean carb sources at most meals instead of 2 days a week?

Report Post
 

tayjeremy
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2007
Location:
Posts: 270

I do, however recommend taking in 10g of BCAA and 10g of glutamine pre-workout (immediately before) and another 10-20g (at least) of BCAAs during the workout (for its anti-catabolic properties.



An insulin spike at the right time. To maximise post-workout recovery and anabolism we need an insulin spike post-workout. Normally we use carbs post-workout to spike insulin, but on a low-carbs diet we can't. However several amino acids do have pro-insulin properties. The BCAAs and especially leucine, glutamine, glycine can all spike insuline. Whey isolate also has a pro-insulin property. So it is very important to consume a large amount of protein, BCAAs (15-30g), glutamine (10-20g and more if your stomach can handle it) and ideally glycine (5-10g or more if your stomach can handle it).

- Glutamine, even though it is a somewhat overrated supplement, especially if you are eating carbs, can be very useful on a low-carbs diet because it can be turned into glucose than stored as glycogen in the muscle. So even though you are not consuming carbs, if your daily glutamine intake is high, your glycogen stores will never be depleted.


I dont know if this answers your question. But CT basically said he does recommended a pre-workout concoction which will help restore glycogen stores... which you have just said will be depleted....


Also, Ketones are very "Glycogen sparing"; i'm sure CT will get back with that shortly haha.

Report Post
 

Otep
Level 4

Join date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 3898

I figured I'd post this, assuming CT keeps reading this thread (which is great!)

This comes from the article "Refined Physique Transformation".

So remember, when using a low-carb approach, fat intake should be high enough for your body to avoid turning into a protein-burning machine. During a proper low-carb diet, your fat intake should be pretty close to your protein intake. Remember that 1 gram of fat has 9 calories while 1 gram of protein has 4. So 110g of fat is equal to 250g of protein. A 50/50 ratio (plus trace carbs) is a good place to start.


I find myself linking this article to fat guys in the beginners section a lot. It's really helpful.

My question though- on the AD, a lot of guys complain of mental fogginess and lethargy if their protein intake is this high (50/50 p/f ratio). This is commonly attributed to glucogenesis, where protein gets used as fuel (I... believe that is the correct term).

The commonly presecribed antidote is to decrease protein intake and increase fat. In my personal experience, the fogginess and lethargy subside after these changes (assuming they're large enough- changing 200kcal from protein to fat was enough for me out of 2500 aggregate kcals).

So why such a high ratio of protein to fat?

Note- it is not my intent in any way to call you out, CT. I'm just trying to mesh my personal experience with yours.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

tayjeremy wrote:
Also, Ketones are very "Glycogen sparing"; i'm sure CT will get back with that shortly haha.


It's obvious! ''glycogen sparing'' simply means that you don't use as much glycogen as usual. This is kinda expected if your body relies mostly on another fuel source (ketones).

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

Tiribulus wrote:


The thing that stuck with me about the above was the idea of fats/ketones being used for anaerobic work or at least that's what it sounds like you're saying. Everything I've read and experienced indicates that glycogen is the only fuel usable for anaerobic work read weightlifting.

I don't know how you would have sufficient glucose for training under that plan.


If that were the case (can only use glycogen for anaerobic work) the human race would not have survived past the stone age!!! Especially in regions without much fruits.

Don't be fooled; the human body is the ultimate adaptive machine. EVERY tissue in the body in EVERY circumstances can adapt to use more than one source of fuel, otherwise survival of the species would be impossible.

For years it was believed in the scientific community that the brain could only function on carbs... turns out that ketones are just as effective for that purpose.

While I do agree that carbs are more efficient during intense strength work, ketones and fat CAN be used as a fuel source too.

And even if you go low-carbs (50g or less per day) you will not completely deplete muscle glycogen ever. The body will always maintain a ''survival amount'' of glycogen by converting some amino acids into glucose than store it as glycogen. Glycerol, the ''backbone'' of the fat molecule can also be turned into glucose.

NOW, it sounds bad to turn amino acids into glucose... and it is; IF those amino acids come from muscle tissue. But that's why I recommend a higher protein intake when doing a ketogenic diet (1.75g per pound instead of 1.25-1.50g), that way you will use the amino acids left in the free amino acid pool to produce glucose instead of breaking down muscle tissue.

And as it was mentionned, ketones are glycogen-sparing, so your body can ''stretch'' the glycogen stores it has for a longer period of time.

The one carb-up meal a week is not used only by me. Poliquin use the same method with his clients (which includes a lot of high level athletes), Vince Gironda used it with his top bodybuilders (including Larry Scott and Momo Makkaway) and recently Dave Palumbo uses it with all of his clients. The human body can store around 400g (up to 500g if you are a more muscular individual) of glycogen in his muscles. There is no sense in doing a huge carb-load consisting of 2000g of carbs consumed over 2 days, especially considering that when you are fat adapted you will not fully deplete your glycogen stores anyway.

That having been said I will not argue against your diet since it's basically how *I* am eating right now (read my First person article). But I do dispute your claims that your body CANNOT use anything by glycogen for fuel during strength training. Heck, I once ate less than 50g of carbs/day for 4 months while still competing in olympic lifting and training twice a day. And I did not lose strength, my relative strength actually went up since I lost 20lbs.


Report Post
 

Bizmark
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 275

This is awesome. More questions have been answered in the past two pages of this thread than the entire "My Experience on the Anabolic Diet" thread. I'm really glad this thread got started.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

Bizmark wrote:
This is awesome. More questions have been answered in the past two pages of this thread than the entire "My Experience on the Anabolic Diet" thread. I'm really glad this thread got started.


Maybe because those participating to this thread are not blind followers of the AD dogma, but rather are individuals with open minds trying to apply the concepts of low-carbs dieting to better fit their needs and physiology.

The funny thing is that even Dr. Di Pasquale (who 'invented' the anabolic diet) is straying away from its original principles and has modified quite a bit.

Report Post
 

Bizmark
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 275

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
The funny thing is that even Dr. Di Pasquale (who 'invented' the anabolic diet) is straying away from its original principles and has modified quite a bit.


Are you talking about "The Metabolic Diet" books here or something unpublished? I've read all his stuff plus most of Lyle McDonald's, Charles Poliquin's, a lot of yours, and some other's who have done work and research with low carbs. It seems like I'm almost addicted to finding out more information about this stuff =).

Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Bizmark wrote:
This is awesome. More questions have been answered in the past two pages of this thread than the entire "My Experience on the Anabolic Diet" thread. I'm really glad this thread got started.

Maybe because those participating to this thread are not blind followers of the AD dogma, but rather are individuals with open minds trying to apply the concepts of low-carbs dieting to better fit their needs and physiology.

The funny thing is that even Dr. Di Pasquale (who 'invented' the anabolic diet) is straying away from its original principles and has modified quite a bit.


Thank you for the input CT!

I'm going to make this work.

Report Post
 

doubleh
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 429

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:


The thing that stuck with me about the above was the idea of fats/ketones being used for anaerobic work or at least that's what it sounds like you're saying. Everything I've read and experienced indicates that glycogen is the only fuel usable for anaerobic work read weightlifting.

I don't know how you would have sufficient glucose for training under that plan.


If that were the case (can only use glycogen for anaerobic work) the human race would not have survived past the stone age!!! Especially in regions without much fruits.

Don't be fooled; the human body is the ultimate adaptive machine. EVERY tissue in the body in EVERY circumstances can adapt to use more than one source of fuel, otherwise survival of the species would be impossible.

For years it was believed in the scientific community that the brain could only function on carbs... turns out that ketones are just as effective for that purpose.

While I do agree that carbs are more efficient during intense strength work, ketones and fat CAN be used as a fuel source too.

And even if you go low-carbs (50g or less per day) you will not completely deplete muscle glycogen ever. The body will always maintain a ''survival amount'' of glycogen by converting some amino acids into glucose than store it as glycogen. Glycerol, the ''backbone'' of the fat molecule can also be turned into glucose.

NOW, it sounds bad to turn amino acids into glucose... and it is; IF those amino acids come from muscle tissue. But that's why I recommend a higher protein intake when doing a ketogenic diet (1.75g per pound instead of 1.25-1.50g), that way you will use the amino acids left in the free amino acid pool to produce glucose instead of breaking down muscle tissue.

And as it was mentionned, ketones are glycogen-sparing, so your body can ''stretch'' the glycogen stores it has for a longer period of time.

The one carb-up meal a week is not used only by me. Poliquin use the same method with his clients (which includes a lot of high level athletes), Vince Gironda used it with his top bodybuilders (including Larry Scott and Momo Makkaway) and recently Dave Palumbo uses it with all of his clients. The human body can store around 400g (up to 500g if you are a more muscular individual) of glycogen in his muscles. There is no sense in doing a huge carb-load consisting of 2000g of carbs consumed over 2 days, especially considering that when you are fat adapted you will not fully deplete your glycogen stores anyway.

That having been said I will not argue against your diet since it's basically how *I* am eating right now (read my First person article). But I do dispute your claims that your body CANNOT use anything by glycogen for fuel during strength training. Heck, I once ate less than 50g of carbs/day for 4 months while still competing in olympic lifting and training twice a day. And I did not lose strength, my relative strength actually went up since I lost 20lbs.




I agree with a previous poster, fantastic thread. However, this discussion between CT and Tribulus leads me to another question. If the body can only hold 400-500 g of glycogen at max capacity, the question that springs to my mind is: how quickly are glycogen stores used up when training hard multiple times per week on the AD (or similar very low-carb diet)? I understand it is glycogen-sparing, and I also understand as CT wrote that the body clings to a "baseline" of glycogen, so it's never FULLY used up, but the reason I ask is explained below.

I agree that the body can adapt to burning fat for fuel, even during anaerobic exercise. But CT, you even admit that "carbs are more efficient during intense strength work". So what I think Tribulus was getting at is optimization. Perhaps it's possible to burn only fat, but as lifters, wouldn't it be preferable to replenish glycogen regularly so as to be able to maximize our efforts?

See this link: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/...er.chapter.2911

"Moreover, the glucose from glycogen is readily mobilized and is therefore a good source of energy for sudden, strenuous activity. Unlike fatty acids, the released glucose can provide energy in the absence of oxygen and can thus supply energy for anaerobic activity."

Clearly this text, at least in some aspects, flies in the face of what we've all just said (see the part on the brain only being able to use glucose). But if we agree that fat CAN be used to sustain anaerobic activity, it still makes sense that burning glucose is far more efficient because it doesn't have to be oxidized like fat - correct? So therefore - and again, someone more knowledgeable in chemistry than I step in if I get this wrong - doesn't it stand to reason that replenishing glycogen semi-regularly is a good idea for lifters b/c it is a better energy source for anaerobic activity (since it doesn't have to be oxidized to release ATP, i.e. energy)?

I've used the AD pretty much as originally written with great success, but the key to the whole deal, as Disc Hoss once wrote, is skimming just above the ketosis line. I've got a few thoughts on this, but I'd like to hear what you think, CT, about the above questions. So to summarize (sorry for long post):

1) If the body can only hold 400-500 g of glycogen at max capacity, the question that springs to my mind is: how quickly are glycogen stores used up when training hard multiple times per week on the AD (or similar very low-carb diet)?

2) Doesn't it stand to reason that replenishing glycogen semi-regularly is a good idea for lifters b/c it is a better energy source for anaerobic activity (since it doesn't have to be oxidized to release ATP, i.e. energy)?

Thanks!

Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Bizmark wrote:
This is awesome. More questions have been answered in the past two pages of this thread than the entire "My Experience on the Anabolic Diet" thread. I'm really glad this thread got started.

Maybe because those participating to this thread are not blind followers of the AD dogma, but rather are individuals with open minds trying to apply the concepts of low-carbs dieting to better fit their needs and physiology.

The funny thing is that even Dr. Di Pasquale (who 'invented' the anabolic diet) is straying away from its original principles and has modified quite a bit.


Many people jump into the diet before they fully research it, the "experience" thread reflects that.

Report Post
 

ronaldo7
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1329

How would one transition off a low carb diet to a high carb diet?

Would it be "smart" to just start it as you did when switching to high far or would it be less risky to up the carbs little by little?

Report Post
 

Bizmark
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 275

ronaldo7 wrote:
How would one transition off a low carb diet to a high carb diet?

Would it be "smart" to just start it as you did when switching to high far or would it be less risky to up the carbs little by little?


Read the Getting Unshredded article by Dr. John Berardi. Here's the link: http://www.T-Nation.com/...e.do?id=1226387
But a while back on the PN forums I asked about coming off the AD and was answered by one of the trainers saying that slowly upping your carbs week by week by about 30g is also a good way.

Report Post
 

Tiribulus
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 8880

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
<<< But I do dispute your claims that your body CANNOT use anything by glycogen for fuel during strength training. >>>


I don't know everything, but my understanding has been that while any of the 3 macros can be converted into glycogen in a pinch, glycogen itself is the only direct fuel used for actual anaerobic muscle contraction. If that is not the case then I have been in error. If it is then why not just provide enough carbs to easily maintain stores, but no more, as precisely as that's reasonably possible.

I am all with ya on the way most people load and it accounts for why they gain too much fat and I don't believe it's healthy either. I may get a few hundred grams over the whole weekend and I'm on the verge of going to one day as well.

I gotta say man, I don't see the wisdom in using aminos for anything except repair and recovery any more than is unavoidable, especially in a lipid adapted environment. Fats work better and in their dietary absence you get the bonus of adipose stores being easily tapped into.

Maybe the fact that I'm viewing this from the deep end of my second year in a fat adapted state is coloring my thinking.

PS, were missing you (and Barr) in the NHL playoffs thread.

Report Post
 

goya
Level 0

Join date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 63

I think a lot of people are forgetting that regarless if you are in ketosis or not, the body will convert protein to glucose via gluconeogenesis.

Therefore low carb + high protein will still produce plenty of glucose. In fact you can still get an insulin spike from a high protein meal. Only fat does not raise insulin.

That has always been my problem with low carb diets in the context of body building. In fact I wonder if too much protein can kick you out of ketosis?

Also I don't believe in switching diets all the time. Pick one that works and agrees with you and stick to in for the long term. If you want to cut, reduce a little of everything (but mostly fat and carbs). And if you want to gain add a little of everything.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

doubleh wrote:

1) If the body can only hold 400-500 g of glycogen at max capacity, the question that springs to my mind is: how quickly are glycogen stores used up when training hard multiple times per week on the AD (or similar very low-carb diet)?


It depends on the type of training you use. For example doing a biceps-only session will use less total glycogen than a lower body session. If you do 30 sets per workout you will use more glycogen than if you do 5 sets per workout. If you do sets of 8-15 reps you will use more glycogen than if you do sets of 1-5 reps.

But and ''average non-idiotic'' training session will use around 90-150g of glycogen. So in theory you would deplete your glycogen in 4 weekly workouts. BUT this isn't so because of two reasons:

A) When you are fat adapted and in a ketogenic state, which is glycogen sparing, you might only use up half as much glycogen. So you could, in theory require 8 workouts to deplete glycogen. But even if that is the case, you will never completely deplete glycogen because...

B) Even in the absence of carbs, your body will still replenish the glycogen stores to some extent. It will do so by transforming certain amino acids into glucose(glutamine, alanine, serine, glycine and threonine being the most glucogenic amino acids) which can then be stored as muscle glycogen. Obviously you want to avoid breaking down muscle amino acids to build new glucose, which is why a higher protein intake is important if your carbs intake is low: in that case the body will use the amino acids from the free amino acids pool to produce new glucose. ''Won't this reduce the amount of protein that we can use to build muscle?''. Not really, if you are a natural trainee there is a limited amount of protein that you can use to build muscle tissue. Over 1.0 to 1.25g per pound is about the limit; so if your protein intake is at 1.5 to 1.75g per pound, you will be able to use the excess to form new glucose without interfering with protein synthesis.

doubleh wrote:
2) Doesn't it stand to reason that replenishing glycogen semi-regularly is a good idea for lifters b/c it is a better energy source for anaerobic activity (since it doesn't have to be oxidized to release ATP, i.e. energy)?


Yes... but most cyclical diets go overboard on the carb-up. Since you are never depleting your glycogen stores completely, 200-250g every 7 days is enough, unless you are training twice a day everyday, in which case you will need more frequent loadings.

Report Post
 

Bizmark
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 275

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
doubleh wrote:
2) Doesn't it stand to reason that replenishing glycogen semi-regularly is a good idea for lifters b/c it is a better energy source for anaerobic activity (since it doesn't have to be oxidized to release ATP, i.e. energy)?


Yes... but most cyclical diets go overboard on the carb-up. Since you are never depleting your glycogen stores completely, 200-250g every 7 days is enough, unless you are training twice a day everyday, in which case you will need more frequent loadings.



I read a while back that Coach Poliquin was using ketogenic diets with more frequent carbloads for his elite athletes, I don't remember exactly what was said but I do remember that Dr. Di Pasquale had influenced it somewhat.

I think the reason for it was because the athletes, once fat adapted, would be running off both the fat metabolism and the carb metabolism with more frequent carb loads, causing the body to be able to stretch it's glycogen store more than if it was running off glycogen alone. And I believe this glycogen sparing is an extremely large part if not the largest part of the Anabolic Diet in adding muscle size (please correct me if I'm wrong).

Do you know if Coach Poliquin is still using these diets for his athletes?

Report Post
 

ProjectX
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 224

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Since you are never depleting your glycogen stores completely, 200-250g every 7 days is enough, unless you are training twice a day everyday, in which case you will need more frequent loadings.



so if you ARE doing twice a day training, say six days a week, just how frequent would the carb loadings be?

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

ProjectX wrote:
Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Since you are never depleting your glycogen stores completely, 200-250g every 7 days is enough, unless you are training twice a day everyday, in which case you will need more frequent loadings.



so if you ARE doing twice a day training, say six days a week, just how frequent would the carb loadings be?


Stop looking for a universal answer! There isn't one. It depends on various factors including insulin sensitivity, training volume, activity levels, metabolic rate, etc.

Me personally, when I train twice a day, I have to have a carb containing meal every 4th day. This meal normally provides 200g of carbs. When I train only once a day I have to eat a carb meal every 7th day.

BUT I'm extremely lean. Individual who are fatter need to space out their carb meals more.

AND it is NOT a carb load. A carb load is ingesting a ton of carbs over a period of 1-2 days. I'm talking about a carb MEAl.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

Bizmark wrote:

I read a while back that Coach Poliquin was using ketogenic diets with more frequent carbloads for his elite athletes, I don't remember exactly what was said but I do remember that Dr. Di Pasquale had influenced it somewhat.

I think the reason for it was because the athletes, once fat adapted, would be running off both the fat metabolism and the carb metabolism with more frequent carb loads, causing the body to be able to stretch it's glycogen store more than if it was running off glycogen alone. And I believe this glycogen sparing is an extremely large part if not the largest part of the Anabolic Diet in adding muscle size (please correct me if I'm wrong).

Do you know if Coach Poliquin is still using these diets for his athletes?


Di Pasquale recommended a mid-week carb spike when and individual is lean and using the Anabolic diet to gain size. It is NOT a second carb load, but rather small spike of 100-200g on Thursday, ideally post-workout.

Charles, much like I do (and it is exactly what Gironda recommended), recommend a moderate amount of carbs every 4th day IF the individual is lean enough and insulin sensitive enough.

Report Post
 

andersons
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1243

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

<<If that were the case (can only use glycogen for anaerobic work) the human race would not have survived past the stone age!!! Especially in regions without much fruits.

Don't be fooled; the human body is the ultimate adaptive machine. EVERY tissue in the body in EVERY circumstances can adapt to use more than one source of fuel, otherwise survival of the species would be impossible.


I echo that this is a very helpful thread.

About 7 years ago I tried very low carb diets, twice, with dismal results. I did them strictly for 3 weeks and then 2 weeks without losing any weight (I still don't know how that was possible) and feeling completely awful. Maybe that wasn't enough time for me to adapt.

I know that I can lose fat and stay relatively lean eating carbs. However, I think it was you, Coach Thibaudeau, who said something recently like, It's hard to get VERY lean while eating carbs. I am trying to get leaner than I've ever been so I started experimenting with lower carbs again.

This time went better, maybe because I had already been hypocaloric and somewhat carb restricted (compared to usual). But I felt progressively worse for the 3 weeks I ate no carbs other than green veggies. That is, at first I felt fine and lost fat. But after a few weeks I had low blood sugar episodes which were immediately fixed by eating some carbs. Most annoying is that after awhile with low carbs, I get blurred vision! It is hard to function with the blurred vision.

I have also noticed that I feel better when eating meals with a lot of protein and a little fat, rather than vice versa. That seems bad as well, like my body is better at using protein for fuel than fat.

It seems that I am NOT adapting to low carbs, and I am not sure what to do. Should I bull through the problem episodes, hoping that my body will eventually be forced to adapt?

And what exactly is the payoff if I do? I ASSUME that adapting to using fat (and protein?) for fuel will make the body want to use excess calories (nutrients?) for muscle building rather than fat storage, and/or preferentially use stored fat to fuel calorie (nutrient?) deficits, thereby changing body comp more effectively over time. ?

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

andersons wrote:
It seems that I am NOT adapting to low carbs, and I am not sure what to do. Should I bull through the problem episodes, hoping that my body will eventually be forced to adapt?


25% of the population will actually do better on a moderate carbs diet (40% protein, 40% carbs, 20% fat)
than on a low carbs diet. It seems like you are one of these guys, some are just not built to optimally function in a very low carbs environment. YES your body can adapt, but it means that you will be able to function and survive NOT achieve your body comp goals. Adaptation is meant for survival of the species, not looking hawt on the beach.


Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

CT, How do you feel about the "AD's" testoterone boosting claims?

Report Post
 

ProjectX
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 224

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
ProjectX wrote:
Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Since you are never depleting your glycogen stores completely, 200-250g every 7 days is enough, unless you are training twice a day everyday, in which case you will need more frequent loadings.

so if you ARE doing twice a day training, say six days a week, just how frequent would the carb loadings be?

AND it is NOT a carb load. A carb load is ingesting a ton of carbs over a period of 1-2 days. I'm talking about a carb MEAl.


Thanks CT. oh, and i only said "loadings" because i was referring to what you had said, otherwise i did mean just a meal:

"unless you are training twice a day everyday, in which case you will need more frequent loadings."

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

Dirty Tiger wrote:
CT, How do you feel about the "AD's" testoterone boosting claims?


Here are some facts:

1. Cholesterol is the raw material that will ultimately be used to make testosterone (well it is used to build the precursor hormones to testosterone which eventually get converted to testosterone).

2. Studies have shown that a diet very low in dietary fat leads to lower testosterone levels.

So in theory it would seem correct that a diet that is low in carbs and high in fat (the AD is only one of the the many such diets, and it's far from being the best one) would boost testosterone.

However, ultimately you are limited by the enzymes that convert the precursor hormones into testosterone. So yes, increasing dietary fat can increase testosterone levels IF the former amount of fat consumed was suboptimal. However at some point ingesting more fat will not lead to higher testo levels because you don't have the enzymes necessary to do the job.

Report Post
 

Tiribulus
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 8880

Dirty Tiger wrote:
CT, How do you feel about the "AD's" testoterone boosting claims?


In my opinion this was where Dr. D overstated his case. He makes a statement in the original book claiming steroid like results which is unfortunate as that strains credulity and he is smarter than that.

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Dirty Tiger wrote:
CT, How do you feel about the "AD's" testoterone boosting claims?

Here are some facts:

1. Cholesterol is the raw material that will ultimately be used to make testosterone (well it is used to build the precursor hormones to testosterone which eventually get converted to testosterone).

2. Studies have shown that a diet very low in dietary fat leads to lower testosterone levels.

So in theory it would seem correct that a diet that is low in carbs and high in fat (the AD is only one of the the many such diets, and it's far from being the best one) would boost testosterone.

However, ultimately you are limited by the enzymes that convert the precursor hormones into testosterone. So yes, increasing dietary fat can increase testosterone levels IF the former amount of fat consumed was suboptimal. However at some point ingesting more fat will not lead to higher testo levels because you don't have the enzymes necessary to do the job.



I'd also like to add that when they say "increase testosterone" when it comes to the AD or dietary fat increases, we aren't talking about 200 ng/dl or anything close to that. We're talking small, probably non-noticable increases here. Its nothing to get excited about, but it is a nice little perk of the diet.

Report Post
 

ProjectX
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 224

MODOK wrote:
I would definitely recommend it( with a few mods) to anyone looking to gain solid bodyweight with minimal fat gain.


Hey MODOK, what are the "few mods" you are talking about?

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

ProjectX wrote:
MODOK wrote:
I would definitely recommend it( with a few mods) to anyone looking to gain solid bodyweight with minimal fat gain.

Hey MODOK, what are the "few mods" you are talking about?


Well, like I mentioned, I had unBELIEVABLE stretch marks from the growth. I have long suspected that this was due to a nutritional deficiency of polyunsaturated fats in my diet, which contribute significantly to elasticity of the skin. To be fair, DiPasquale DOES mention eating the healthy fats on the diet, but he didn't really stress the point enough for my 19 year old mind to understand it :). I was just a kid trying to get big, with little attention to detail. I would simply modify the food choices slightly, include some lower fat protein sources (chicken breast) and then supplement the healthy fats with that (canola, olive, fish oils), instead of simply eating scrambled eggs, cheese, beef to get the fat. I would also try to limit the sucrose to the first day of the carb-up due to the fructose component. I'd probably eat more liberally on Saturday, then on sunday I would switch to grains only for the carb up. Again, Dr. Di mentions this in the book, but he doesn't stress it. Thats really about it. It doesn't need much modification!

Report Post
 

ProjectX
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 224

thanks MODOK!

Report Post
 

PonceDeLeon
Level 3

Join date: Aug 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 4709

CT:

Thanks a lot for your wisdom in this thread. I'm sitting around 145 (at 5'7) and probably 18% BF. I want to gain a ton of mass of course, but an illness brought me down to 132 from 176 and I have only recently started gaining weight and getting better.

Following your advice on page 1, if I were to go with say:

Protein: 1.5g /lb
Fat: .75g /lb (yes, good fats mostly)
Carbs: 50g

Then up the protein/fat grams by 10% each, as a starting point, and gauge the diet from there...

Is that a good approach for someone with my BF levels looking to gain mass? Or does it matter what my ultimate physique goal is?

I used to entertain the idea of dieting down to 10% bf levels first, but I have been convinced that it's foolish and I should have way more muscle mass on me before thinking of cutting; I've no problem gaining fat while gaining muscle, just curious about your take on the matter.

Thanks again for your time.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

PonceDeLeon wrote:
CT:

Thanks a lot for your wisdom in this thread. I'm sitting around 145 (at 5'7) and probably 18% BF. I want to gain a ton of mass of course, but an illness brought me down to 132 from 176 and I have only recently started gaining weight and getting better.

Following your advice on page 1, if I were to go with say:

Protein: 1.5g /lb
Fat: .75g /lb (yes, good fats mostly)
Carbs: 50g

Then up the protein/fat grams by 10% each, as a starting point, and gauge the diet from there...

Is that a good approach for someone with my BF levels looking to gain mass? Or does it matter what my ultimate physique goal is?

I used to entertain the idea of dieting down to 10% bf levels first, but I have been convinced that it's foolish and I should have way more muscle mass on me before thinking of cutting; I've no problem gaining fat while gaining muscle, just curious about your take on the matter.

Thanks again for your time.



It is a good idea IN YOUR CURRENT STATE, You lost a lot of muscle and you need to rebuild it before dieting down. The starting point I gave (the one you mentioned) is adequate for your goal. Since you will essentially be regaining muscle, chances are that your will not gain fat. Once you reach your previous muscle mass then you can entertain the thought of cutting down to 10%.

Report Post
 

doubleh
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 429

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
doubleh wrote:

1) If the body can only hold 400-500 g of glycogen at max capacity, the question that springs to my mind is: how quickly are glycogen stores used up when training hard multiple times per week on the AD (or similar very low-carb diet)?


It depends on the type of training you use. For example doing a biceps-only session will use less total glycogen than a lower body session. If you do 30 sets per workout you will use more glycogen than if you do 5 sets per workout. If you do sets of 8-15 reps you will use more glycogen than if you do sets of 1-5 reps.

But and ''average non-idiotic'' training session will use around 90-150g of glycogen. So in theory you would deplete your glycogen in 4 weekly workouts. BUT this isn't so because of two reasons:

A) When you are fat adapted and in a ketogenic state, which is glycogen sparing, you might only use up half as much glycogen. So you could, in theory require 8 workouts to deplete glycogen. But even if that is the case, you will never completely deplete glycogen because...

B) Even in the absence of carbs, your body will still replenish the glycogen stores to some extent. It will do so by transforming certain amino acids into glucose(glutamine, alanine, serine, glycine and threonine being the most glucogenic amino acids) which can then be stored as muscle glycogen. Obviously you want to avoid breaking down muscle amino acids to build new glucose, which is why a higher protein intake is important if your carbs intake is low: in that case the body will use the amino acids from the free amino acids pool to produce new glucose. ''Won't this reduce the amount of protein that we can use to build muscle?''. Not really, if you are a natural trainee there is a limited amount of protein that you can use to build muscle tissue. Over 1.0 to 1.25g per pound is about the limit; so if your protein intake is at 1.5 to 1.75g per pound, you will be able to use the excess to form new glucose without interfering with protein synthesis.

doubleh wrote:
2) Doesn't it stand to reason that replenishing glycogen semi-regularly is a good idea for lifters b/c it is a better energy source for anaerobic activity (since it doesn't have to be oxidized to release ATP, i.e. energy)?


Yes... but most cyclical diets go overboard on the carb-up. Since you are never depleting your glycogen stores completely, 200-250g every 7 days is enough, unless you are training twice a day everyday, in which case you will need more frequent loadings.



First of all, CT, thank you for all your input on this thread. Your expertise is most helpful. I'd like to pick your brain again, if you don't mind.

Re: A) and B) above - 2 things here. #1, my understanding of the AD was that it is NOT strictly a ketogenic diet. The carb loads were designed to keep one out of ketosis, the whole "skimming the surface of ketosis" line the venerable Disc Hoss used way back in the original AD thread, and one of the reasons for the carb-ups. #2 - it makes sense these type of diets are glycogen sparing, as NORMAL aerobic activity is fueled by burning fat. However, as brought up by Tribulus, if intense anaerobic activity (i.e. weightlifting) CAN be fueled by an energy source other than glycogen, what is it, and why eat ANY carbs? You said the body can replenish glycogen by converting fats and protein, so why not stick to those macros? In other words, what is the benefit (outside of overall health, let's focus strictly on training in this context) of eating carbs?

Re: your response to 2) above - This ties in with the above question. If as you say a fat-adapted trainee may only use half as much glycogen as normal in a training session, what is he burning for fuel? He may use less glycogen, but he's expending the same amount of energy per session, carbless diet or not. SOMETHING is fueling the muscle.

My thought is this: if it's fat, then semi-frequent carb loads make sense because we don't want fat to fuel anaerobic activity because of the oxidization issue I brought up earlier. If it's still glycogen, through the conversion of fats and protein, then my original question stands: why re-load on carbs at all if the body can replenish glycogen on its own?

I hope this is coherent, thanks again.

Report Post
 

andersons
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1243

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

25% of the population will actually do better on a moderate carbs diet (40% protein, 40% carbs, 20% fat)
than on a low carbs diet. It seems like you are one of these guys, some are just not built to optimally function in a very low carbs environment. YES your body can adapt, but it means that you will be able to function and survive NOT achieve your body comp goals. Adaptation is meant for survival of the species, not looking hawt on the beach.


For the moderate-carbs population, is there any benefit to varying the amount of carbs at different meals or different days?

Report Post
 

-Prodigy-
Level 3

Join date: Apr 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 32

andersons wrote:
Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

25% of the population will actually do better on a moderate carbs diet (40% protein, 40% carbs, 20% fat)
than on a low carbs diet. It seems like you are one of these guys, some are just not built to optimally function in a very low carbs environment. YES your body can adapt, but it means that you will be able to function and survive NOT achieve your body comp goals. Adaptation is meant for survival of the species, not looking hawt on the beach.

For the moderate-carbs population, is there any benefit to varying the amount of carbs at different meals or different days?



You might want to look into Carb Cycling, keeping the protein and fat intake constant during the week, having low, medium and high carb days (typically corresponding high and medium days to workout days), and also restricting carbs to morning and post-workout meals.

CT wrote a article detailing all the how-to's on it;
http://www.T-Nation.com/...le.do?id=811783

Been doing it for over a month now and the results are great.

Report Post
 

Joaquin
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2003
Location: Mexico
Posts: 56

Has anyone truly answered the question: can you build muscle on a low carb (less than 50 carbs/day) diet?

I love to eat low carb and do well on it. However, when I want to go on a mass cycle (with a little AS help) I don't gain muscle. I'd like to give the low carb approach another shot. I should also mention that i don't like to carb up. it gets me out of ketosis and i feel lethargic. I weigh 210 with 8% BF and always get 400gm of protein. so protein intake is never the problem.

Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

Joaquin wrote:
Has anyone truly answered the question: can you build muscle on a low carb (less than 50 carbs/day) diet?



I am starting to lose sight of why this diet is superior to a medium-high carb diet....at least for mass building.

It so freaking complicated!

Report Post
 

Joaquin
Level 4

Join date: Mar 2003
Location: Mexico
Posts: 56

the bottom line for me is: can someone build muscle on a low carb diet without a carb up meal or day (consistent low carbs)? this would assume a high caloric intake and bodybuilding style training

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

Joaquin wrote:
Has anyone truly answered the question: can you build muscle on a low carb (less than 50 carbs/day) diet?

I love to eat low carb and do well on it. However, when I want to go on a mass cycle (with a little AS help) I don't gain muscle. I'd like to give the low carb approach another shot. I should also mention that i don't like to carb up. it gets me out of ketosis and i feel lethargic. I weigh 210 with 8% BF and always get 400gm of protein. so protein intake is never the problem.


Did you read my initial post?

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

Dirty Tiger wrote:
Joaquin wrote:
Has anyone truly answered the question: can you build muscle on a low carb (less than 50 carbs/day) diet?



I am starting to lose sight of why this diet is superior to a medium-high carb diet....at least for mass building.

It so freaking complicated!


It's not superior for mass-building, never claimed that it was. The question was whether it was possible to gain muscle mass on a low-carbs diet. The answer to that question is YES if protein and energy intake is adequate.

Now is it BETTER at building mass than a diet including moderate and well-timed doses of carbs? NO! However most peoples will stay leaner while adding size on a high calories low-carbs diet.

Personally, when training to gain I like to add carbs during and post-workout. But even then I rarely exceed 75-100g per day (100-125g if you count veggies, trace carbs and nuts). Some with better insulin sensitivity than me can handle a higher carbs intake than this without adding too much fat, but I find that a this amount of carbs, while ingesting a high protein/moderately-high fat (mostly good fats) diet the rest of the day is what allows me to add muscle without gaining much fat and while feeling great.

But it is an individual thing. For example, my ex-girlfriend (a natural competitive bodybuilder) was extremely insulin-sensitive and thus could eat a large amount of carbs without any problems. Heck, in her fat-loss/pre-contest diet she would still consume 300g of carbs per day (she was 135lbs).

Put her on a low-carbs diet and she will not be gaining much muscle mass (she is among the 25% of the population who do better on higher carbs).

I already mentioned my friend Hugo Girard, the 6'2'' 330lbs strongman with 10.5% body fat. He is even less insulin sensitive than me so he doesn't even ingest carbs (except for green veggies and nuts) in his diet; but his strength and muscle mass are still going up. This is an example of someone who does much better on high fats than high carbs.

I can't tell you precise numbers; but from my experience:

75% of the North American population is insulin resistant to some degree

25% of the same population is insulin sensitive

The 75% breaks down pretty much evenly (35-40%) between individuals who are very insulin resistant (will do best on a close to no carbs diet, 50g and less) and those who are moderately resistant (will do best on a moderate carbs intake, around 0.5g per pound timed properly).

Report Post
 

Dirty Tiger
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2004
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 1451

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
Dirty Tiger wrote:
Joaquin wrote:
Has anyone truly answered the question: can you build muscle on a low carb (less than 50 carbs/day) diet?



I am starting to lose sight of why this diet is superior to a medium-high carb diet....at least for mass building.

It so freaking complicated!

It's not superior for mass-building, never claimed that it was. The question was whether it was possible to gain muscle mass on a low-carbs diet. The answer to that question is YES if protein and energy intake is adequate.

Now is it BETTER at building mass than a diet including moderate and well-timed doses of carbs? NO! However most peoples will stay leaner while adding size on a high calories low-carbs diet.




Fair enough. Staying leaner while adding size is my goal.

I appreciate all your advice. I've learned a geat deal.

Report Post
 

doubleh
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 429

*Re-posting from before. Anyone with more knowledge in this field than I have any ideas about the below questions?*

Re: A) and B) above - 2 things here. #1, my understanding of the AD was that it is NOT strictly a ketogenic diet. The carb loads were designed to keep one out of ketosis, the whole "skimming the surface of ketosis" line the venerable Disc Hoss used way back in the original AD thread, and one of the reasons for the carb-ups.

#2 - it makes sense these type of diets are glycogen sparing, as normal aerobic activity is fueled by burning fat. However, as brought up by Tribulus, if intense anaerobic activity (i.e. weightlifting) CAN be fueled by an energy source other than glycogen, what is it, and why eat ANY carbs? You said the body can replenish glycogen by converting fats and protein, so why not stick to those macros? In other words, what is the benefit (outside of overall health, let's focus strictly on training in this context) of eating carbs?

Re: your response to 2) above - This ties in with the above question. If as you say a fat-adapted trainee may only use half as much glycogen as normal in a training session, what is he burning for fuel? He may use less glycogen, but he's expending the same amount of energy per session, carbless diet or not. SOMETHING is fueling the muscle.

My thought is this: if it's fat, then semi-frequent carb loads make sense because we don't want fat to fuel anaerobic activity because of the oxidization issue I brought up earlier. If it's still glycogen, through the conversion of fats and protein, then my original question stands: why re-load on carbs at all if the body can replenish glycogen on its own?

*Anyone? From CT's latest post, clearly something about carb ingestion contributes positively to the muscle-building process; I just can't seem to figure out what it might be.

Report Post
 

ronaldo7
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1329

CT for someone who is 5'11" and around 170-175 lbs with 12-15% bodyfat(not lean), What would you recommend as far as carb meals frequency. I train 5-7 days a weeks(lifting 5-6 days a week and soccer 1-3 times per week).

I have been eating carbs for the last 3-4 days(feel much better with no carbs), should I do an induction phase again even though I been on the AD for around 3 months.?

I am trying to get down to 9-10% bodyfat.

Thanks.

Report Post
 

Tiribulus
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 8880

doubleh wrote:
<<< if intense anaerobic activity (i.e. weightlifting) CAN be fueled by an energy source other than glycogen, what is it, and why eat ANY carbs? You said the body can replenish glycogen by converting fats and protein, so why not stick to those macros? >>>


Until somebody demonstrates otherwise I'm standing by my position that glycogen is the only direct source of fuel for intense anaerobic work, but that lipids and aminos can be converted to glycogen in the absence of available glycogen or carbs.

My question then remains, why? When the judicious intake of some carbs takes care of the whole deal and leaves dietary protein alone to rebuild damaged muscle while fats are used to fuel everything else? Of course this is never absolute. There will be some unavoidable crossover to some degree, but with all due respect I'm not grasping why I would ever intend for my metabolism to use protein for energy when it's so easy to avoid and the potential downside is so serious.

Report Post
 

GrabAKimber
Level 4

Join date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 47

Just figured I asked CT for his thoughts on acute acidosis on such a diet like the Anabolic diet. Obviously with a VLCD, the lack of alkaline foods like fruit and starchy vegetables such as yams and potatoes would leave someone at a high-ER chance of developing acidosis.

But CT, do you know if it's anything to worry about? Obviously one of the best vegetables to eat are your leafy greens which seem to be the most alkalizing, which you often recommend for those who chose to have 50g or less carbs a day. Is it anything anyone should worry about while on the Anabolic diet, or alteration of it?

BTW Thanks for making this thread one of the most knowledgable threads on bodybuilding via low-carb diets. This thread is an A+ wealth of information because of you. Thanks

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

GrabAKimber wrote:
Just figured I asked CT for his thoughts on acute acidosis on such a diet like the Anabolic diet. Obviously with a VLCD, the lack of alkaline foods like fruit and starchy vegetables such as yams and potatoes would leave someone at a high-ER chance of developing acidosis.

But CT, do you know if it's anything to worry about? Obviously one of the best vegetables to eat are your leafy greens which seem to be the most alkalizing, which you often recommend for those who chose to have 50g or less carbs a day. Is it anything anyone should worry about while on the Anabolic diet, or alteration of it?

BTW Thanks for making this thread one of the most knowledgable threads on bodybuilding via low-carb diets. This thread is an A+ wealth of information because of you. Thanks



It is of EXTREME IMPORTANCE to keep your body alkaline. If your body is acid all the metabolic processes (including protein synthesis and fatty acid mobilization) are rendered less effective.

That's why green veggies are important. Glutamine can also help keep the body alkaline.

Report Post
 

MODOK
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2111

Not to mention that keeping your body alkaline is necessary to continue as a member of the human race. Fortunately we have a very powerful and tightly controlled buffering system in our bodies which allow us to stay upright and above the ground.

Report Post
 

doubleh
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 429

Tiribulus wrote:
doubleh wrote:
<<< if intense anaerobic activity (i.e. weightlifting) CAN be fueled by an energy source other than glycogen, what is it, and why eat ANY carbs? You said the body can replenish glycogen by converting fats and protein, so why not stick to those macros? >>>

Until somebody demonstrates otherwise I'm standing by my position that glycogen is the only direct source of fuel for intense anaerobic work, but that lipids and aminos can be converted to glycogen in the absence of available glycogen or carbs.

My question then remains, why? When the judicious intake of some carbs takes care of the whole deal and leaves dietary protein alone to rebuild damaged muscle while fats are used to fuel everything else? Of course this is never absolute. There will be some unavoidable crossover to some degree, but with all due respect I'm not grasping why I would ever intend for my metabolism to use protein for energy when it's so easy to avoid and the potential downside is so serious.


Well, I did some further research rather than being lazy and it appears I found my answer. (Quick point of clarification: intense anaerobic work is *directly* fueled by ATP, and indirectly by glycogen, see the following.) ATP fuels short, intense anaerobic bursts (i.e. lifting), and is replenished in the short-term by breaking down creatine phosphate, and intermediately by burning glycogen. So, glycogen comes into play when ATP and/or ATP + CP sources in muscles are exhausted. HERE IS THE KEY that I found, at least insomuch as I understand it: glycogen is readily available in the liver and muscles when needed and is a superior source for ATP than lipids because it does not require oxidation, a long metabolic process (see my earlier post in this thread; hey, I was right!) However, on low-carb diets, if glycogen stores are depleted, lipid oxidation comes into play, but due to the nature of this process, it takes much longer to replenish the ATP.

So, to draw conclusions from this, it would appear that depleted glycogen levels would impair one's ability to recover ATP levels during a workout, therefore impacting one's work capacity. This makes sense, illustrated nicely by the "crash" day that most ADers hit in the 2-week adaptation phase, and once adapted, seems to me like something to avoid like the plague.

To further draw conclusions, if the AD is glycogen-sparing, it seems to me to be something that we don't necessarily want. If the body gets used to "hordeing" glyc, it may impact ATP replenishment during workouts. In my opinion carb-ups are necessary to keep the body out of "glycogen starvation mode", if that makes sense, so it will continue to liberally make use of it when needed, such as in the gym.

Bottom line: I think carb-ups over the weekend, or 1-day, or something similar - anything that can keep the body used to storing and utilizing glycogen when needed WITHOUT taking one out of fat-burning mode - make more sense than CT's 1 carb-up meal approach. This, after all, was Dr. D's original theory regarding this diet. I feel weird disagreeing with someone as knowledgeable as CT, but maybe he can respond again if he's so inclined.

Just wanted to share what I discovered; I like closure on things. And I'm no expert in this field, so if anyone is and can provide info to counter any conclusions I've drawn, I'm all ears. I have no problem changing my opinion when presented with new facts. Apologies for the long post, hope someone can make use of it.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

doubleh wrote:
Bottom line: I think carb-ups over the weekend, or 1-day, or something similar - anything that can keep the body used to storing and utilizing glycogen when needed WITHOUT taking one out of fat-burning mode - make more sense than CT's 1 carb-up meal approach. This, after all, was Dr. D's original theory regarding this diet. I feel weird disagreeing with someone as knowledgeable as CT, but maybe he can respond again if he's so inclined.


The thing is that you are somewhat misinterpreting my recommendations. The one meal carb-up is for body composition only; or in other words to MAXIMIZE fat loss.

If you read my article ''refined physique transformation'' you will find that my recommendations change depending on the degree of leanness of the individual.

These recommendations are:

For men

Above 20% body fat: carb-up at around 0.75g of carbs per pound every 14 days

15-20% body fat: carb-up at around 0.75g of carbs per pound every 10 days

12-15% body fat: carb-up at around 1.0g of carbs per pound every 7 days

10-12% body fat: carb-up at around 1.25g of carbs per pound every 7 days

Less than 10% body fat: carb-up at around 1.25g of carbs per pound every 4-5 days

I also make recommendations regarding the type of food to use for a carb-up:

For men

Above 20% body fat: carb-up only with clean carbs (yams, non-green veggies, fruits, oatmeal, rice, potatoes, grits, etc.)

15-20% body fat: carb-up only with clean carbs

12-15% body fat: carb-up mostly with clean carbs. One or two ''cheat'' items is acceptable but avoid eating foods that are both high in fat and sugar.

10-12% body fat: Carb-up can include a bit more cheat food, but still stay away from fat/sugar combo foods.

Less than 10% body fat: the refeed can be more lenient. While results will be better with cleaner food, when you get down below 10% it's okay to include some dirtier meals (pizza, burgers, pastries, etc.) in your refeed day.

Finally the recommended amount of carbs for the ''diet days'' are also dependent on body fat levels:

For men

Above 20% body fat: no more than 30g of carbs per day

15-20% body fat: 0.25g of carbs per pound of body weight per day

12-15% body fat: 0.35g of carbs per pound of body weight per day

10-12% body fat: 0.45g of carbs per pound of body weight per day

Less than 10% body fat: 0.55g of carbs per pound of body weight per day

So someone who is relatively lean (10-12% for example) and weighs 200lbs can use 90g per day, preferably around workout time. So you could very well have 40g of carbs pre/during your workout, 40g post-workout and 10g of trace carbs during the day.

Even someone who is slightly less lean (12-15%) at the same 200lbs can go up to 70g per day which stills allows some carbs peri-workout.

Really, my recommendation to go super low carbs is only for fatter individuals.

The point I was making in this thread is that it IS possible to gain size while not ingesting carb. I never said that it was optimal.

******

BTW, just a correction regarding ATP. ATP is the ONLY fuel source that the body can use. When ATP is depleted the body will use different substrates to produce new ATP and replenish the reserves.

Creatine phosphate is the first substrate used to produce ATP and it is the fastest (higher power) but the one with the shortest duration (around 12 seconds).

Glucose used under anaerobic condition is the second way to replenish ATP, it is the second fastest way to produce ATP but is is also of short duration (around 70-120 seconds)

Glucose used under aerobic condition is the third way to replenish ATP. It is not as fast as the previous two systems but can last longer (up to 15 minutes and sometimes more)

Fatty acids via fatty acid oxidation is the fourth way and it is the slowest of the energy production pathways, but last a REALLY long time! When doing intense training this system is used mostly to replenish ATP stores during recovery periods. In fact most of the ATP is replenished between sets via the fat oxydation pathway.

Now what about ketones you say? Very little literature exists on the subject because basically no research studies the energy substrate used during weight training while in a ketogenic state. My educated guess from the available literature which shows no decrease in performance during a low-carbs diet when performing work in the zone that would normally rely on the third energy system (glucose with oxigen) would suggest that ketones are about the same power (speed of energy production) as using glucose + oxygen to produce ATP and it would also last as long as the fatty acid oxydation system.

So this tells us that during ''regular bodybuilding'' training (sets of 6-12 reps lasting 30-60 seconds), glycogen would indeed be the only way to efficiently fuel your workouts. Ketones could also be used, but the lower energy production speed would be too slow to allow the maintenance of the same intensity.

HOWEVER if one is performing work that relies more on the phosphagen system (ATP and creatine) ... sets of 1-5 reps lasting 20 seconds or less ... training intensity should not be affected by a ketogenic diet since glucose is not super important during those sets AND that ATP is replenished between sets either by using ketones or fat.

Report Post
 

Tiribulus
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 8880

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
<<< The thing is that you are somewhat misinterpreting my recommendations. The one meal carb-up is for body composition only; or in other words to MAXIMIZE fat loss. >>>


This does help me understand your reasoning in this thread quite a bit better too.

EDIT: Lemme throw in here too that, at least in the AD thread, many guys jump into horrendous junk fest carb ups within the first few weeks or even for their first one which I think is a major mistake for the vast of majority and calls into question their motivation for starting in the first place.

Some may be able to do that. I can't, still can't and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone. I think using the word "load" for carb ups leads some guys astray.

Also, I came to the conclusion a long time ago that the various low carb/fat adapted approaches are versions of one another and being fully adapted and then finding a carb strategy that works for you is the key. That may not get smiles out of some AD purists, maybe not even Disc Hoss, but I really think that's the ticket.

I do completely agree with DH that going a few months by the book is best for most, especially inexperienced lifters, but once you get a grip on where you are it makes no sense to continue in lock step if some changes will serve you better.

I rarely say anything like that in the AD thread because most guys usually in there are very new to this whole thing and not in a position to know what changes to make.

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

Tiribulus wrote:
Christian Thibaudeau wrote:
<<< The thing is that you are somewhat misinterpreting my recommendations. The one meal carb-up is for body composition only; or in other words to MAXIMIZE fat loss. >>>

This does help me understand your reasoning in this thread quite a bit better too.


Heck, I am consuming around 100g of carbs peri-workout myself (read my first person article) so it would be a bit foolish of me to say that you MUST avoid carbs totally!

Report Post
 

Christian Thibaudeau
Contributor

Join date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 16973

Tiribulus wrote:

I rarely say anything like that in the AD thread because most guys usually in there are very new to this whole thing and not in a position to know what changes to make.


SO TRUE! And this goes for training too. Individualisation is the key as well as autoregulation. Dr. Siff used to call it cybernetic periodization: you do plan the overall backbone of your program but the actual application of it varies depending on your day-to-day self evaluation.

HOWEVER to make that work you NEED to be extremely objective about yourself and be able to understand your body perfectly. Those who can't do that should stick to a more rigid plan.

Report Post
 

darwin420
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 411

CT, I just wanted to say thanks for taking the time to go over all this! I know I've certainly learned a great deal.

My experience with the AD was pretty positive, and I learned that I function better with fewer carbs. I recently upped my carb intake to less than 100g/day, and it's been amazing how much better I function.

Now, thanks to all this information you've provide (and others, as well), I understand why!

Report Post
 

SteelyD
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2007
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 6378

Great thread!

This is going to come in handy-- Thanks DT!! It took me almost a week to get through the A-D thread in S/N!!

I've started a recipe thread for A-D 'Italian' Cuisine:

http://www.T-Nation.com/...c.do?id=2144267

Report Post
 

David1991
Level 0

Join date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 517

MODOK: Would u say ur more like an ecto, meso, or endo?

CT: So basically this is just a normal keto diet your talking about right? I have a friend who used to be really fat and now he's gotten upto 190lb. and around 9%bf at 5'7! he's gotten such good results from basically just doing a keto diet.

I just started my bulk today but unfortunately i'm starting at 12.5%bf. I'm going to be following a carb cycling plan similar to the one in ur "carb cycling codex" article, just with less fat because it put me at around 45% fat.

anyway last time i did keto i had some serious problems. i wasnt gaining weight (due to water weight leaving which i didnt think about) so i jacked up the calories to near 3800 pretty quickly.

I noticed i gained fat pretty damn fast that way and when i began my cut my results were good but nothing exceptional if i remember correctly. I like the concept of Keto but does it seem like i shouldnt do it or that i just ate too much?

Also i dont know if it would be good to go back anytime soon because i got really bad acne from it. I'm just now having it be unnoticeable and it started back in september

Report Post
 

greekdawg
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 2356

This was a great thread. Thanks for bumping it, I missed it before.

I will add my two cents in.

I've been playing around with the AD diet/low carbs diet for like the past 5+ yrs.

When I first started, like most people I felt like shit because I was probably used to eating way more carbs than my body can handle so the sudden absence of carbs was quite the shock.

As time went out, I adapted and for the most part it has been great. My energy is always constant and 100%. I don't have the constant up and downs of the carb based diet. I never have problems with energy in the gym like some report and I still get great pumps. Maybe, a lower carbs diet just suits me better long term.

However, the AD weekend carbups were always hell. I even questioned the validity of them. I would always feel like shit after them, eating if eating "clean" carbs.


Historically, (like Thibs said earlier in the thread) this type of diet, first recommended by Gironda was never meant to have a "Carb-up" days

The all day carb-ups IMO is the quickest way to get off the bandwagon so to speak. at least for me. Also, it is easy to revert back to your negative carb habits that you were avoiding during the week.

My guess is if you can handle a 1-2 day carb-up without negative effects, you probably don't need a low carb diet in the first place.

Things started to really crystalize for me when I started adhering to the Gironda guideline of 1 carb meal a week. Thib's article, "Refined Physique Transformation" really is when everything started making sense. I try to follow that.

Once, I become lean enough to my liking I will add back in post WO carbs.

And to answer the original question, yes, I am getting bigger.







Report Post
 

David1991
Level 0

Join date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 517

What bf% and weight are u at now greekdawg?

I've always been interested in these types of diets but last time i did a keto diet my skin got really oily and i got really bad acne. i agree about not having a full carb up weekend but i'd think 2-3 big carb meals one day of the week would be of importance.

and i just read that refined physique transformation too, good stuff. Sometimes it's hard to determine what i should do based on my level, like i would assume i shouldnt do OVT being a 2 weeks away from 17 and only training for 2 years, but overall i like his methodology and he shows that "former fat boys" really can look great

Report Post
 

ronaldo7
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 1329

David1991 wrote:
What bf% and weight are u at now greekdawg?

I've always been interested in these types of diets but last time i did a keto diet my skin got really oily and i got really bad acne. i agree about not having a full carb up weekend but i'd think 2-3 big carb meals one day of the week would be of importance.

and i just read that refined physique transformation too, good stuff. Sometimes it's hard to determine what i should do based on my level, like i would assume i shouldnt do OVT being a 2 weeks away from 17 and only training for 2 years, but overall i like his methodology and he shows that "former fat boys" really can look great


What kind of foods were you eating?. Were you going all out with the beacon and cheese or were you eating your chicken breast with EVO on it?. What I mean is, were you taking in mostly "healthy" fats or were you just eating what ever was high fat?

Report Post
 

David1991
Level 0

Join date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 517

ronaldo7 wrote:
What kind of foods were you eating?. Were you going all out with the beacon and cheese or were you eating your chicken breast with EVO on it?. What I mean is, were you taking in mostly "healthy" fats or were you just eating what ever was high fat?


all healthy foods...basically peanut butter, a TON of olive oil, eggs, turkey burgers, cottage cheese, chicken, etc...

Report Post
 

Moon Knight
Level 1

Join date: Jul 2004
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 764

I just got done the two week induction phase of the traditional AD (this is about the third time in my life I have gotten started on it, never stayed on it long before). I found a link to this thread from one of the threads in S&N. CT's variation on the low-carb diet with carb-up idea interests me though.

Having found it a bit difficult to fit in vegetables easily while staying under 30 g of carbs but also staying above 25 g of fiber, I would consider having up to 50 g of carbs to play with a boon. Variety and nutrition would be much improved. I could even include a glass of wine once my adrenals get back up to snuff (I believe there is about 5 - 7 g of sugar in a 3 oz glass).

The idea of a limited carb-up also resonates with me. As much as sugar filled items sometimes tempt me, I really don't find myself craving them that much. I seem to have bad reactions to some of my carb-up meals (food allergy? acid? metabolic reaction? don't know) despite being moderately clean. I seem to smooth out pretty quick too.

Anyway, I think I would like to give CT's variation a go instead of the standard AD. I had good success years back on a low-carbs diet with no carb-ups with about 40 g or so of carbs per day. I have carbed up today for the first time after the two week induction phase I mentioned above. I ate maybe 75% clean.

Do I need to start another two week induction to switch diets or am I fat adapted enough despite the full day carb feast today?

Report Post
 

Killroy
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 1

Hey guys,

Long time lurker, first time poster (Always wanted to say that).

Anyhow, I have been on the AD for over 9 months and I have loved the results. Body fat dropped from mid 20's to low 10's (or even lower if I ever get a hydrostatic test dunk to verify) and I have had no problems with either bulking up or cutting on the AD.

My macros are as clean as possible. my sat/poly/mono ratios are almost equal (21% sat/13% mono/17% poly) and I get a good amount of daily fats from fish oil, flax oil, CLA, EVOO, eggs and the rest from animal meat.

I'm also taking a multi-vitamin pack each day that has pretty much all the nutrients that the Doc suggests in the book.

I do have a question for CT that he might shed some light on: Up to about a month ago I was keeping all my daily carbs mainly from green veggies (lettuce, cabbage, broccoli) but I have to tell you that I absolutely hate veggies. It s is very hard for me to eat them every day so I really find it a chore.

Last month I found a very clean Whole wheat whole grain bread at Costco (Alpine Valley) where the only ingredients are 100% Whole Grain Wheat flour, Organic Whole Grain Wheat flour, water honey, sea salt, yeast. This stuff tastes great and if I cut each slice into four equal pieces I get about 4.25g of carbs (one slice has 18g of carbs 2g fibers).

I slowly began substituting my veggies with with the bread and I can still keep my daily carbs under control but my question is... am I taking one step forward/3 steps back by only using whole wheat bread instead of veggies?

I know veggies are important for certain nutritional content but can they be completely removed (or at least cut down substantially) without effecting my overall nutritional goals.

Report Post
 

cyph31
Level 1

Join date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 1089

No amount of multivitamins will replace actually eating veggies

Report Post
 

PRD84
Level 1

Join date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 94

Wow great thread. Question for the group. Starting the adaptation phase tomorrow. Should I count veggie CHO or not? I have heard both yes and no. Looking for some advice. Also, artificial sweeteners? CHO or not? Just wondering.

Report Post
 

Simon Forsyth
Level 1

Join date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 228

Dirty Tiger wrote:
Curious.

It seems like the S&N posters don't follow the bodybuilding forum and the bodybuilders in this forum don't follow the AD.

I think I have my answer.


I did it back in 2004 for about 6 months before eating all the fat made me feel so sick and it was good to switch back to a balanced carb/protein/fat mix.. I love eating salads now as well.. I did gain muscle on it but was it because I was really ripped and any muscle mass I added looked better I dont know I was sitting at about 8-9% bf and 84kgs at 165cm.

Anyway mate if your looking at doing it just jump in and have at it, You never know until you try it.

Hope this has been helpful.

Report Post
 

appro
Level 0

Join date: Apr 2008
Location: England
Posts: 103

I'm just about to start my first bulk on the AD (first ever bulk actually) so hopefully I'll be able to provide a bit of feedback. Wish me luck!

Report Post
 

KIDDETROIT
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 2

Coach, incredible info. thanks. I am versed on CKDs and I am wondering one thing. You have touched on the different energy pathways. I understood that in a carb restricted/depleted (anaerobically) state, the ingested carb. will replace muscular and haepatic glycogen stores first. This effect takes place from 24-72 hours. (I have read from diff. authors). I am very carb intolerant and from German descent.

Question: I also understood that dietary fat, when consumed, obviously cannot be converted to glycogen and if not used for energy will most certainloy be deposited as body fat. With that in mind, how is this avoided with a semingly high fat intake?

Report Post
 

lildave
Level 2

Join date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 417

Ok I'm looking at starting bulking next month but I'm not exactly sure yet what approach I should take.
I have read the easy hardgainer article and that totally sounds like me.. but one problem I have had is as soon as I start eating a ton of carbs I bloat up like crazy.
What would be my best approach?
carb cycling
ad
or just stick with the plan in the article?

I think the carb cycling approach seems like the best option since I shouldnt get as bloated but I will still get the carbs I need..

Report Post
 

kickureface
Level 0

Join date: Feb 2008
Location:
Posts: 580

on the AD diet i did not gain much mass while eating ~3500 cals at 173. apparently i need a lot more (5k probably) to gain.

Report Post
 

TEEN-BUILDER
Level 0

Join date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 43

Hi bro, but lets say u suddenly go of the diet. would u put alot of fat back on really quickly?
what if u bring back carbs slowly..?

Report Post
 

Evil1
Level 2

Join date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, CAN
Posts: 563

TEEN-BUILDER wrote:
Hi bro, but lets say u suddenly go of the diet. would u put alot of fat back on really quickly?
what if u bring back carbs slowly..?


from what i have read. going back into a zone type (40c-30p-30f) worked best for people.

Report Post
 

Steel88
Level 4

Join date: Nov 2007
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 285

I've been on a bulk for 3 months now on the anabolic diet and its worked well enough for me. I've gone from 180 with 149lbs of muscle to 205 with 165lbs of muscle. I plan on continuing my bulk until I reach 240lbs, after which I will hopefully cut down to a lean 200lbs. During my last carb up I managed to stuff myself with 800 grams of carbs, and I've been loving the diet so far.

Report Post
 

andersons
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2003
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1243

Killroy wrote:
Hey guys,

Long time lurker, first time poster (Always wanted to say that).

Anyhow, I have been on the AD for over 9 months and I have loved the results. Body fat dropped from mid 20's to low 10's (or even lower if I ever get a hydrostatic test dunk to verify) and I have had no problems with either bulking up or cutting on the AD.

My macros are as clean as possible. my sat/poly/mono ratios are almost equal (21% sat/13% mono/17% poly) and I get a good amount of daily fats from fish oil, flax oil, CLA, EVOO, eggs and the rest from animal meat.

I'm also taking a multi-vitamin pack each day that has pretty much all the nutrients that the Doc suggests in the book.

I do have a question for CT that he might shed some light on: Up to about a month ago I was keeping all my daily carbs mainly from green veggies (lettuce, cabbage, broccoli) but I have to tell you that I absolutely hate veggies. It s is very hard for me to eat them every day so I really find it a chore.

Last month I found a very clean Whole wheat whole grain bread at Costco (Alpine Valley) where the only ingredients are 100% Whole Grain Wheat flour, Organic Whole Grain Wheat flour, water honey, sea salt, yeast. This stuff tastes great and if I cut each slice into four equal pieces I get about 4.25g of carbs (one slice has 18g of carbs 2g fibers).

I slowly began substituting my veggies with with the bread and I can still keep my daily carbs under control but my question is... am I taking one step forward/3 steps back by only using whole wheat bread instead of veggies?

I know veggies are important for certain nutritional content but can they be completely removed (or at least cut down substantially) without effecting my overall nutritional goals.


I personally would never consider a whole grain product a decent substitute for veggies. Different veggies have different beneficial nutrients that you are never going to get if you don't eat them. Sulforaphane in broccoli, for example.

As far as bread goes, though, a similar bread from Alpine Valley is my favorite - the Organic Multi-Grain with Omega 3, which I also buy at Costco, has 15 gram total carbs and 3 grams fiber per slice, or 20%.

Very moist and tasty, whereas many high-fiber breads are gritty and dry. Higher percentage of fiber (which is my criterion for bread) than the oft-touted Exekiel bread, and better tasting IMO.

Back to veggies - I find them much more delicious if they are grilled or sauteed with plenty of salt and a thin coating of oil. I sometimes toss them with vinaigrettes or sauces, like fresh pesto, as well. Grilling them over foil is fast, easy, and delicious. I've grilled green beans that tasted like french fries.

Report Post
 

DH
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 1507

Hello, gents.

First, in the interest of preserving Doc�??s true position and to add clarity to any statements concerning any changes Mauro has allegedly made on his cyclical dietary concept, I�??d like to add a few things.

In short, Maruo hasn�??t changed anything significant and has often been misrepresented.

He just sent me a personal copy of his second edition of Amino Acids and Proteins for the Athlete, where he again expounds the principles behind his cyclical dietary practices.

Mauro also contributed the diet section to Bompa�??s latest release of Serious Strength Training. Doc has not changed his dietary structure in any real way, just wanted to clear that notion up from the start.

Now, problems seem to stem from a combination of Doc�??s need for brevity in the original AD and the apparent over-zealousness of folks not reading the books in their entirety. Or not reading the Anabolic Solution, which is his expanded version of the AD.

Concerning the issue of macro choices, Doc�??s Anabolic Solution and his made for public MD address this issue quite adequately, even though some castigate his original work for not spelling certain aspects out.

Mauro has time and again mentioned the original was a quick and dirty how-to manual geared toward the bodybuilder. Current criticisms are misdirected as his newer editions all address this issue.

Also, as far as the load duration, it was stated in the original and in all updated variants the the real indication of when to stop the load is once you begin to smooth out.

It is an individual thing that will vary even with the same individual depending on what type of CHO is ingested. So the critique of time frames again is a bit unfair. I can understand how the misconception got started, but it�??s not a true reflection of what Mauro wrote or taught, even initially.

He stated that in his experience 24-48 hours worked best on his attempt to best his PL max�??s. But, he stated and then stressed thereafter that load intake and CHO type are aspects that each person must experiment with.


He looked at this as a �??plus�?? to the AD as each week is an opportunity to find what works best as far as type of CHO and duration of intake.

With respect to the issue of how much fat to take in, he stated that as long as one hit about 40% minimum total intake, that the diet would work. He suggested that one begin with 50-60%.

It was actually Dan Duchaine who advocated up to 70% and even 80%, not Doc. Again, sometimes a lack of attention to detail can bring unnecessary criticism.

Now, let me put the key way to think about massing on the AD as succinctly as possible. *What you eat (macros) determines what you gain/lose (tissue type). How much you eat determines how much you gain/lose.*

Now that�??s a bit footloose and fancy-free, but it best brings the concept home.

Best,
DH

PS. While the AD thread can seem impossible to navigate, I have addressed the core issues as to the workings and rationale of the diet in the early days of the thread. The answers are there if you go looking for them. Anything worth having is worth working for, eh.

Report Post
 

Tiribulus
Level 1

Join date: Aug 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 8880

DH wrote:
<<< With respect to the issue of how much fat to take in, he stated that as long as one hit about 40% minimum total intake, that the diet would work. He suggested that one begin with 50-60%. >>>


Just to clarify a bit further, you are not saying to swap the difference with cho during the week. I know you're not, but I'm just nailing that down as somebody is bound to think or at least wonder that.

Report Post
 

PRD84
Level 1

Join date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 94

wow...like this thread alot. I will be stopping by regularly from now on I am sure. I occasionaly have questions about some things not addressed in the Anabolic Solution. So I hope you dont mind if I pick your brains a little. thank you.

Pat

Report Post
 

greekdawg
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2003
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 2356

DH wrote:
Hello, gents.

First, in the interest of preserving Doc�??s true position and to add clarity to any statements concerning any changes Mauro has allegedly made on his cyclical dietary concept, I�??d like to add a few things.

In short, Maruo hasn�??t changed anything significant and has often been misrepresented.

He just sent me a personal copy of his second edition of Amino Acids and Proteins for the Athlete, where he again expounds the principles behind his cyclical dietary practices.

Mauro also contributed the diet section to Bompa�??s latest release of Serious Strength Training. Doc has not changed his dietary structure in any real way, just wanted to clear that notion up from the start.

Now, problems seem to stem from a combination of Doc�??s need for brevity in the original AD and the apparent over-zealousness of folks not reading the books in their entirety. Or not reading the Anabolic Solution, which is his expanded version of the AD.

Concerning the issue of macro choices, Doc�??s Anabolic Solution and his made for public MD address this issue quite adequately, even though some castigate his original work for not spelling certain aspects out.

Mauro has time and again mentioned the original was a quick and dirty how-to manual geared toward the bodybuilder. Current criticisms are misdirected as his newer editions all address this issue.

Also, as far as the load duration, it was stated in the original and in all updated variants the the real indication of when to stop the load is once you begin to smooth out.

It is an individual thing that will vary even with the same individual depending on what type of CHO is ingested. So the critique of time frames again is a bit unfair. I can understand how the misconception got started, but it�??s not a true reflection of what Mauro wrote or taught, even initially.

He stated that in his experience 24-48 hours worked best on his attempt to best his PL max�??s. But, he stated and then stressed thereafter that load intake and CHO type are aspects that each person must experiment with.


He looked at this as a �??plus�?? to the AD as each week is an opportunity to find what works best as far as type of CHO and duration of intake.

With respect to the issue of how much fat to take in, he stated that as long as one hit about 40% minimum total intake, that the diet would work. He suggested that one begin with 50-60%.

It was actually Dan Duchaine who advocated up to 70% and even 80%, not Doc. Again, sometimes a lack of attention to detail can bring unnecessary criticism.

Now, let me put the key way to think about massing on the AD as succinctly as possible. *What you eat (macros) determines what you gain/lose (tissue type). How much you eat determines how much you gain/lose.*

Now that�??s a bit footloose and fancy-free, but it best brings the concept home.

Best,
DH

PS. While the AD thread can seem impossible to navigate, I have addressed the core issues as to the workings and rationale of the diet in the early days of the thread. The answers are there if you go looking for them. Anything worth having is worth working for, eh.


Good to see you still around these parts DH.

Report Post
 

Intermezzo
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2008
Location:
Posts: 80

Hey Thib, i have a question regarding mental performance when in a state of ketosis. (Anyone else that has some knowledge please enlighten me too)


You mentioned earlier that, generally speaking, being on a low carb (say 50g-100g of carbs per day) can lead to a lack in mental performance, whereas being on a <30g carb per day diet will mean your body is purely using ketones, and you will not have decreased mental performance.

Is that to say that, ketones are as effective at providing the brain with energy as a high carb diet (say >300g per day), meaning that your cognition / attention span / memory retention will not suffer?

Lets say that if the only thing i valued higher than my bodybuilding pursuits was my university study and i needed every mental performance edge i could get, would i be at all disadvantaged by being in a state of ketosis cf non-restricted carbs?


I searched a few databases for some decent studies to prove/disprove this but couldn't find any

Report Post
 

Fuzzyapple
Level 3

Join date: Nov 2008
Location:
Posts: 2742

The brain can function using ketones so focus shouldn't be a problem. As long as the brain is getting a energy source to use it works just fine.

Report Post
 

winkel
Level 4

Join date: Jul 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 76

Great thread.

I had a liberal carb bulk up go a little haywire and have used low carb the last month or so to fit into my pants again. To avoid the same from happening again I will give AD a shot to get me from current 185 lbs to 210 lbs.

I know from previous experience that for some odd reason it will take relatively more calories to gain on AD compared to a higher carb (or more frequent carb-up) type of diet.



Report Post
 

CutestPuppy
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2008
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 73

Intermezzo wrote:
Hey Thib, i have a question regarding mental performance when in a state of ketosis. (Anyone else that has some knowledge please enlighten me too)


You mentioned earlier that, generally speaking, being on a low carb (say 50g-100g of carbs per day) can lead to a lack in mental performance, whereas being on a <30g carb per day diet will mean your body is purely using ketones, and you will not have decreased mental performance.

Is that to say that, ketones are as effective at providing the brain with energy as a high carb diet (say >300g per day), meaning that your cognition / attention span / memory retention will not suffer?

Lets say that if the only thing i valued higher than my bodybuilding pursuits was my university study and i needed every mental performance edge i could get, would i be at all disadvantaged by being in a state of ketosis cf non-restricted carbs?


I searched a few databases for some decent studies to prove/disprove this but couldn't find any


I am a physicist by trade and tutor students for SAT and AP tests. I went from a low-carb with intermittent fasting to AD. If anyone needs their brain to be intact, it's me. Let me assure you, by way of personal experience, that your cognitive functions will be fine and dandy. The brain uses energy to function, sure. However, the energy changes form. At the "thoughts" level (action potentials are carried out by ions), the origin of energy is unimportant.
Plus, not that it matters, but your brain is still getting glucose. True and exclusive ketosis takes days of absolute starvation to reach.

Report Post
 

CutestPuppy
Level 1

Join date: Nov 2008
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 73

winkel wrote:
Great thread.

I had a liberal carb bulk up go a little haywire and have used low carb the last month or so to fit into my pants again. To avoid the same from happening again I will give AD a shot to get me from current 185 lbs to 210 lbs.

I know from previous experience that for some odd reason it will take relatively more calories to gain on AD compared to a higher carb (or more frequent carb-up) type of diet.





Gain weight, not muscle. It's all in the body comp. my brother.

Report Post
 

ribby
Level 0

Join date: Feb 2009
Location:
Posts: 1

Hate to repeat what others have said, but what a great thread. I usually watch my carbs, but a liberal holiday season followed by a liberal january have left me hovering over 16% bf. Just call me chubs. Anyways, thanks to all for the great info, going to go vlc and follow Thib's carb re-feed recommendations. Unfortunately my % puts me in the higher range. Not for long.

Report Post
 

bkmacky9288
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 579

I don't know why the AD has turned into a ketosis diet...to my understanding it's not. But most here, including CT, keep labeling it as so and giving suggestions/facts & tidbits based on being in ketosis

Report Post
 

Vejne
Level 0

Join date: Jan 2009
Location:
Posts: 140

Is spiking insulin post workout a necessity? As a poor student I do not have acces to BCAAs, Glutamine or any supplements, but I managed some time without insulin spike post workout.

Can i reach decent results by this way? nutrients will be stored, whatever insulin spike I cause post workout, or I suppose it totally wrong?..

I only gave some weeks to a low-carb, but high caloric diet, because I wanted to experience it. Now I decided to give it full three months and see wether I can make some gains. ^^

Report Post
 

Avocado
Level 4

Join date: Apr 2006
Location: Alberta, CAN
Posts: 2743

Vejne wrote:
Is spiking insulin post workout a necessity? As a poor student I do not have acces to BCAAs, Glutamine or any supplements, but I managed some time without insulin spike post workout.

Can i reach decent results by this way? nutrients will be stored, whatever insulin spike I cause post workout, or I suppose it totally wrong?..

I only gave some weeks to a low-carb, but high caloric diet, because I wanted to experience it. Now I decided to give it full three months and see wether I can make some gains. ^^


Do you have whey protein powder? If so that will do. If not then just some regular food will do. I know some strong cats that pay just about 0 attention to post workout drinks and just eat some food.

-chris

Report Post
 

Vejne
Level 0

Join date: Jan 2009
Location:
Posts: 140

In fact, I plan to buy some supplements, glutamine, bcaa, perhaps liquid amino and a whey concentrate-isolate blend.

This should do the trick post workout. That glutamine blend is also packed with several insulin mimickers and absorption boosters. I also got a creatine blend (zero caloric) to christmas with ALA, taurine, arginine and other stuff what said to be raise insulin response. if so, then I can use these supps in 2 or 3 months to help me with my gaining..

of course i eat a tons of calories, I just a bit careful, as I don't want to be a 135 kg fatass again as I was 2 years ago in the age of 15. :D So I don't even do 2 days of carb loading with bunch of shit and tons of ice cream, I just get some brown rice with fruits and that's all (maybe 300 grs of carbs? my bf is currently somewhere around 10-11%, slight abs and fibers and veins in my shoulders. I began weight training about 1.5 year ago, and I'm weak and skinny as hell ;) )

I'll post some "progress reports" to this topic in every few weeks until this type of eating can be afforded financially :( :(

Report Post
 

bigAGUS
Level 0

Join date: Jan 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 16

CT recomends coffee as one of the "alowed" drinks on this kind of diets, but I read that caffeine creates an "empty peak" of insulin, and that could take you out of lypolisis.
Whats true about this?

Report Post
 

Candriano
Level 0

Join date: Mar 2008
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 22

I LOVE you christian....i was kinda misunderstood about the whole idea of low carbs, but i understand it so much better now

thank you

Report Post
 

asifmir1981
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 5

hey I just want to know could I get my fats just from flax and olive oil and really limit my saturated fat intake and get the same results doing the anabolic diet? Reason being my cholesterol is slightly high and eating 6 whole eggs and beef all day long seems like it would worsen that. Any advice?

Report Post
 

asifmir1981
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 5

Oh I also forgot to mention that I know the first 2 weeks you have to be virtually 0 carbs, so am i not allowed to take in any fiber either? because i been doing it for 7 days now eating just meat and 2 tbls flax with each of my 6 meals. The scary part is i havent went to the bathroom in those 7 days!

Report Post
 

colinphenom
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2006
Location: Alberta, CAN
Posts: 69

asifmir1981 wrote:
Oh I also forgot to mention that I know the first 2 weeks you have to be virtually 0 carbs, so am i not allowed to take in any fiber either? because i been doing it for 7 days now eating just meat and 2 tbls flax with each of my 6 meals. The scary part is i havent went to the bathroom in those 7 days!


Subtract fibre from your carb intake, it doesnt count! Eat lots of green leafy veggies. And if you have not shit in 7 days I would be worried.

Report Post
 

SmallToBig
Level 0

Join date: Jun 2009
Location:
Posts: 926

asifmir1981 wrote:
Oh I also forgot to mention that I know the first 2 weeks you have to be virtually 0 carbs, so am i not allowed to take in any fiber either? because i been doing it for 7 days now eating just meat and 2 tbls flax with each of my 6 meals. The scary part is i havent went to the bathroom in those 7 days!


How is that even humanly possible to not pass for 7 days ??

What you do is superdose Magnesium - 1000mg - 1400mg should do it, it will clear you out in no time.

And as he said i'd be VERY worried if i didn't pass in 7 days lol feel bloated much ?

Report Post
 

DH
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 1507

NO! fiber does not count toward your CHO total. Good grief! Doc specifically states this in the original AD and all his subsequent works. This is why you should RESEARCH a diet before you start it.

go to the orignial AD thread and read all of my posts if you want to understand the diet.

Know what you are doing before you just jump in guys.

DH

Report Post
 

DH
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 1507

^ Not to be taken in a condescending tone, BTW. ;0

Report Post
 

asifmir1981
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 5

Thanks so much guys I will defintely try the magnesium thing. I did start the fiber yesterday and I did go once but not very much. I dont get it fiber doesnt work for me like it does for some poeple. It actually made me feel a little more bloated.... anything I can take with that? DH I guess I basically read so many different articles about low carb dieting that I got confused. I actually saw on one forum that even fiber can mess things up. Its amazing the different stuff you see in forums. But I never did read the anabolic diet book and I probably should. Thanks again guys!

Report Post
 

guillaume76
Level 4

Join date: Jun 2008
Location:
Posts: 69

Hello,

I am in the AD diet since last October, and lost 26lbs. Until now, loosing fat was my primary purpose, and I tried to maintain muscle mass.

Now I'm wondering if I could not better preserve muscle mass by adding carbs para-workout, for instance 20g of dextrose post-workout ?

I have been pretty carb phobic while the week until now (except for the carb up week of course) and tried to be under 20g every day (I'm 149lbs, for an avereage of 10-12% BF, 1m76 tall). I had no carbs para-workout until now.

1 - Does adding 20g of dextrose post-workout would 'break' the diet and it's effectiveness ?
Or would it be effective to diminish muscle breakdown while staying fat adapted ?

2 - As a last question, does a huge carb up week (2 full days) could help build a little muscle, or would do nothing at all considering the caloric deficit while the week ?
I am aware that CT told that 2 days are way too much, and I understand why, this is just in my case easier to socialize while the week end... so I accept to have slower results.

Regards,
Guillaume.

Report Post
 

forbes
Level 0

Join date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 1038

asifmir1981 wrote:
Thanks so much guys I will defintely try the magnesium thing. I did start the fiber yesterday and I did go once but not very much. I dont get it fiber doesnt work for me like it does for some poeple. It actually made me feel a little more bloated.... anything I can take with that? DH I guess I basically read so many different articles about low carb dieting that I got confused. I actually saw on one forum that even fiber can mess things up. Its amazing the different stuff you see in forums. But I never did read the anabolic diet book and I probably should. Thanks again guys!


Taking fibre WITHOUT water will make you more constipated. You have to have adequate water with your fibre otherwise you'll be worse off than you were.

Report Post
 

asifmir1981
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 5

I am doing the fiber with 12-16 glasses of water and IM doing a little better now but I still feel stuff in my stomach.... I mean this diet works for me everytime but no matter what I seem to do I still dont have regular bowel movements. Anything else I can throw in the mix?

Report Post
 

DH
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 1507

Yes. That is why you stick to the original expert. Di Pasquale. I also very much like Rob Faigins' book Natural Hormonal Enhancement.

The rest are like dingle-berries (my apologies to the fairer sex). They smell like **** and just keep hanging around dependent on the actual source for their survival. ;)

DH

asifmir1981 wrote:
Thanks so much guys I will defintely try the magnesium thing. I did start the fiber yesterday and I did go once but not very much. I dont get it fiber doesnt work for me like it does for some poeple. It actually made me feel a little more bloated.... anything I can take with that? DH I guess I basically read so many different articles about low carb dieting that I got confused. I actually saw on one forum that even fiber can mess things up. Its amazing the different stuff you see in forums. But I never did read the anabolic diet book and I probably should. Thanks again guys!


Report Post
 

DH
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 1507

Eat lots of salad, green beans, and other cruciferous veggies. Its easier than using an actual fiber product. And much healthier too.

Report Post
 

DH
Level 4

Join date: Oct 2002
Location:
Posts: 1507

I just addressed this very issue in the AD thread. It should help you out.

DH

guillaume76 wrote:
Hello,

I am in the AD diet since last October, and lost 26lbs. Until now, loosing fat was my primary purpose, and I tried to maintain muscle mass.

Now I'm wondering if I could not better preserve muscle mass by adding carbs para-workout, for instance 20g of dextrose post-workout ?

I have been pretty carb phobic while the week until now (except for the carb up week of course) and tried to be under 20g every day (I'm 149lbs, for an avereage of 10-12% BF, 1m76 tall). I had no carbs para-workout until now.

1 - Does adding 20g of dextrose post-workout would 'break' the diet and it's effectiveness ?
Or would it be effective to diminish muscle breakdown while staying fat adapted ?

2 - As a last question, does a huge carb up week (2 full days) could help build a little muscle, or would do nothing at all considering the caloric deficit while the week ?
I am aware that CT told that 2 days are way too much, and I understand why, this is just in my case easier to socialize while the week end... so I accept to have slower results.

Regards,
Guillaume.


Report Post
 

bigAGUS
Level 0

Join date: Jan 2009
Location: Argentina
Posts: 16

For fibre, eat vegetables that its charbs are in its undigesteble fibre (at least high % of it), like cruciferous, lettuce, spinach, etc.
With cruciferous you have the advantaje of the Indole 3 Carbinol, helping to reduce the aromatization to strogens and great cancer weapon.

Sorry about my poor english, i hope u guys understand it.

Report Post
 

Mark74
Level 4

Join date: Aug 2009
Location:
Posts: 31

I've been competing in bodybuilding for several years and always followed the typical steady-as-she-goes approach with low fat, moderate carbs and relatively high protein. I slowly pulled out carbs as my diet progressed to get my body fat down. Getting into contest condition was never really a problem so long as I suffered and hated bodybuilding by the day of the show - this indicated I was ripped.

After two contests in the spring I took a short break before training and dieting for a contest in September (last month). Two weeks into my tried-and-true diet I hit the wall motivation-wise. I simply knew I didn't have the willpower to go through another 15 weeks of my typical diet and decided to try something completely new.

Unaware of the AD or any other "name brand" diet I decided to go very low carb and higher fat. Training and dieting to make a certain weight I figured this would help me drop down in a hurry, but to my surprise it didn't occur. My weight stayed stubbornly the same, strength did not drop and my energy levels were much better than with my previous diet. Long-story-short I got in the best shape of my life and barely made weight at weigh-ins.

I've since learned that I was basically following the AD with a two-meal/four-hour carb reload on Saturday. I'm half-way through reading the Anabolic Solution and the key is tailoring the AD to your body. I learned I don't do well with carbs so a couple high carb meals on Saturday was all I needed. I actually dropped the carb meals altogether the last 4 weeks just to ensure I made weight.

I have one more competition in November, but plan to stick with the AD indefinitely...just adding in more calories and possibly a bit more carbs on my carb-up day to aid muscle gain. For me personally the AD diet kicks ass and once customized to your body works quite well.

Report Post
 

strongbulker
Level 0

Join date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 13

hey guys is there another 'my experience on the anabolic diet' thread? the other two have been closed. I have a few questions!

Report Post
 

tomwhite55
Level 0

Join date: Feb 2010
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 1

Thanks for all the great information and advice for training! Also, congrats to all of the people that have been successful with body building. In today's society, it is hard to stay on track becasuse of all the fast food industries lurking around every corner.

I believe that a well balanced diet revolves around eating healthy and maintaining a workout regiment that best fits your body type. If you are looking to count your calories and keep track of what you are eating, head over to http://www.FitClick.com and try the Online Calorie Counter. This counter helps count your calories so you don't have to! Good Luck!

Report Post
 

ADvanced TS
Level 1

Join date: Sep 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 1013

Bump.

Beacause we need more vets in here who've used the AD for bulking.

Report Post
 

BulletproofTiger
Level 4

Join date: Feb 2009
Location: California, USA
Posts: 1816

I'm planning to use the AD for bulking (the bulk starts today). I'll perhaps deviate from it in a cyclical manner (doing at least AD for 3 week periods with with small carb ups (~100 gram) every 4-7 days)... Then maybe I'll do 1-2 weeks of TKD, where my diet is like CT's here: http://www.tmuscle.com/...tian_thibaudeau My main reason to tweak the plan is to keep things fun, but also since I got great fat loss results from following the TKD approach, and I also want to try AD, but they are not compatible to do at the same exact time. I don't know the exact details but I will detail it all out in my training log here: http://tnation.tmuscle.com/...ageNo=0#3729983 and once I get the details worked out I'll come back to this thread and give my plan.

Goal: Bulk - keep BF under 10% while bulking up and trying to gain as much muscle (at least 20 pounds of muscle) in 12 weeks.

Report Post
 

OdysseusUnbound
Level 0

Join date: Jul 2009
Location:
Posts: 106

Christian Thibaudeau wrote:

BTW, just a correction regarding ATP. ATP is the ONLY fuel source that the body can use. When ATP is depleted the body will use different substrates to produce new ATP and replenish the reserves.

So this tells us that during ''regular bodybuilding'' training (sets of 6-12 reps lasting 30-60 seconds), glycogen would indeed be the only way to efficiently fuel your workouts. Ketones could also be used, but the lower energy production speed would be too slow to allow the maintenance of the same intensity.

HOWEVER if one is performing work that relies more on the phosphagen system (ATP and creatine) ... sets of 1-5 reps lasting 20 seconds or less ... training intensity should not be affected by a ketogenic diet since glucose is not super important during those sets AND that ATP is replenished between sets either by using ketones or fat.



Okay, so it has been awhile since anyone posted in this thread, but here goes... Taking the above info into consideration, should one keep reps low (and total number of sets higher) if training on low (or no) carbs?

Report Post